It's great to see these conflicting ideas!
I agree, this is not simple at all - this is why we have no map
namespace, but there is definitely a need. I'm hoping Zurich can
provide a platform where we can get somewhere close in that direction
and generate some momentum.
The fact we have a
On 8 mrt. 2014, at 21:48, Russell Nelson russnel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Derk-Jan Hartman
d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com wrote:
This is thinking way too simple. Would it be nice to be able to do this ?
Sure, but we already have dynamic maps. WikiMiniAtlas, the
Somehow wikitech-l got dropped form the recipient list of this thread; I
know some of the OSM folks are subscribed. Anyway, re-added wikitech-l to
this thread.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like a good idea. If there is no objections to my
On 8 mrt. 2014, at 00:47, Russell Nelson russnel...@gmail.com wrote:
Maps great, yes. Here's what *I* think Wikipedia needs. First and foremost,
OSM is a database, just like Wikipedia articles are data (don't get me
started). It's a foreign database, which means that you have the foreign
Hi all,
first of all I regret very much that I won't be able to make it to the
Zurich Hackathon, but Idaho, USA is a bit too far and I have just
switched to a new job.
Anyhow, I'd just like to chime in and support what Derk-Jan said
above. Even though the WikiMiniAtlas, a dynamic map, is my
