Hi Gabriel,
thank you for that information. Actually I already knew of the project.
Therefore I could imagine a process as I described. This IMHO doesn't
need much i18n, because there is an defined syntax for wt and for html.
On 2012-12-13 20:57, Gabriel Wicke wrote:
On 12/13/2012 06:43 AM,
On 12/13/2012 06:43 AM, Marco Fleckinger wrote:
> Implementing this is not very easy, but developers can may use some of
> the old ideas. Parsing the other way around has to be realized really
> from the scratch but is easier because everything is in a tree. not in a
> single text-string.
>
> Neit
Hello,
On 2012-12-12 20:04, James Alexander wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Andre Klapperwrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 19:30 -0800, James Forrester wrote:
This is not the final form of the VisualEditor in lots of different
ways. We know of a number of bugs, and we expect you to find mo
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Marco Fleckinger
wrote:
> On 2012-12-12 16:58, Chris McMahon wrote:
>>
>> Would it be possible to enable VE on test2 in the same way? I would like
>> to use it in a noisy way, and would rather not make noise on enwiki.
>>
> Do you really mean http://test2.wikipedi
On 2012-12-12 16:58, Chris McMahon wrote:
Would it be possible to enable VE on test2 in the same way? I would like
to use it in a noisy way, and would rather not make noise on enwiki.
Do you really mean http://test2.wikipedia.org? AFAIK the wikidata team
uses this installation as a testing cli
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Matthew Flaschen
wrote:
> I would definitely be willing to serve as a guinea pig, working to
> integrate ProveIt (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ProveIt_GT).
>
Awesome!
Roan
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@li
From: Roan Kattouw
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Lee Worden wrote:
>Very exciting - congratulations!
>
>I know these are early days for the VisualEditor, but is there a plan for
>extension developers to be able to hook in to provide editing for the things
>their extensions support?
Yes, abs
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Daniel Barrett wrote:
> Will the method for hooking into VE be the same as for WikiEditor? Or
> will extension
> developers need to support both editors in two different ways?
>
In general they are both conceptually and technically incompatible.
Here's some mor
On 12/12/2012 11:08 AM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Lee Worden wrote:
>> Very exciting - congratulations!
>>
>> I know these are early days for the VisualEditor, but is there a plan for
>> extension developers to be able to hook in to provide editing for the things
>> t
On 12/11/2012 07:30 PM, James Forrester wrote:
> TL;DR: Today we are launching an alpha, opt-in version of the
> VisualEditor[0] to the English Wikipedia. This will let editors create
> and modify real articles visually, using a new system where the
> articles they edit will look the same as when y
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Daniel Barrett wrote:
> Will the method for hooking into VE be the same as for WikiEditor? Or will
> extension
> developers need to support both editors in two different ways?
>
It won't be the same as for WikiEditors, because the two are very
fundamentally diff
Lee Worden wrote:
> is there a plan
> for extension developers to be able to hook in to provide editing for
> the things their extensions support?
Roan Kattouw responded:
>Yes, absolutely! We've been working on cleaning up and rewriting various
>internal APIs in VE
>such that they can reasonab
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Lee Worden wrote:
> Very exciting - congratulations!
>
> I know these are early days for the VisualEditor, but is there a plan for
> extension developers to be able to hook in to provide editing for the things
> their extensions support?
Yes, absolutely! We've bee
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 19:30 -0800, James Forrester wrote:
> > This is not the final form of the VisualEditor in lots of different
> > ways. We know of a number of bugs, and we expect you to find more. We
> > do not recommend people trying to
On 12/12/2012 09:31 AM, Bartosz Dziewoński wrote:
> Would it be possible to enable VE in a similar manner on other WMF wikis?
Currently Parsoid does not support localized namespaces, link trail
character classes and other features. Without support for these, pages
will not render and round-trip pr
On 12 December 2012 11:57, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 19:30 -0800, James Forrester wrote:
> > This is not the final form of the VisualEditor in lots of different
> > ways. We know of a number of bugs, and we expect you to find more. We
> > do not recommend people trying to use t
Would it be possible to enable VE in a similar manner on other WMF wikis?
I understand the concerns about developers being unable to respond to
feedback in other languages, but most large projects have at least a
few technical people who could serve as "relays", and I'd like to see
some of the int
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 19:30 -0800, James Forrester wrote:
> This is not the final form of the VisualEditor in lots of different
> ways. We know of a number of bugs, and we expect you to find more. We
> do not recommend people trying to use the VisualEditor for their
> regular editing yet. We would
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Chad wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Chris McMahon
wrote:
Would it be possible to enable VE on test2 in the same way? I would like
to use it in a noisy way, and would rather not make noise on enwiki.
It's also enabled for the user namespace, so p
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Chad wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Chris McMahon
> wrote:
> > Would it be possible to enable VE on test2 in the same way? I would like
> > to use it in a noisy way, and would rather not make noise on enwiki.
> >
>
> It's also enabled for the user na
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Chris McMahon wrote:
> Would it be possible to enable VE on test2 in the same way? I would like
> to use it in a noisy way, and would rather not make noise on enwiki.
>
It's also enabled for the user namespace, so people can feel free
to play with it and not be
Would it be possible to enable VE on test2 in the same way? I would like
to use it in a noisy way, and would rather not make noise on enwiki.
-Chris
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:30 PM, James Forrester
wrote:
> TL;DR: Today we are launching an alpha, opt-in version of the
> VisualEditor[0] to the E
On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 7:30 PM, James Forrester wrote:
> TL;DR: Today we are launching an alpha, opt-in version of the
> VisualEditor[0] to the English Wikipedia. This will let editors create
> and modify real articles visually, using a new system where the
> articles they edit will lo
tl;dr:
VE does not work for me
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42988
Hanging after "Review and save" --> "Review your changes" hangs, no saving
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
From: James Forrester
To: Wikimedia developers,
wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikitech-l] Alpha version of the VisualEditor now available
on the English Wikipedia
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
TL;DR: Today we are
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:30 PM, James Forrester
wrote:
> TL;DR: Today we are launching an alpha, opt-in version of the
> VisualEditor[0] to the English Wikipedia. This will let editors create
> and modify real articles visually, using a new system where the
> articles they edit will look the same
TL;DR: Today we are launching an alpha, opt-in version of the
VisualEditor[0] to the English Wikipedia. This will let editors create
and modify real articles visually, using a new system where the
articles they edit will look the same as when you read them, and their
changes show up as they type en
27 matches
Mail list logo
