On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Waldir Pimenta wal...@email.com wrote:
Test it here: http://hexm.de/mw-search
Nice. Is there a way to pass a query string to it, e.g.
http://hexm.de/mw-search?q=%s
? Then we could store this as a bookmarklet with keyword 'ts'[1] and type
`ts 49604` to
No, DXR doesn't help the CSE. I also doubt it will help restoring full
text search on our end, but we'll see.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49674
On the contrary, gitblit is more robust and faster than gitweb, so it
allows crawling by search engines. It was crawled very
On 03/10/2013 07:50 AM, Waldir Pimenta wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to announce a recently created tool that might help the Wikimedia
technical community find stuff more easily. Sometimes relevant information
is buried in IRC chat logs, messages in any of several mailing lists, pages
in
Hi all,
I'd like to announce a recently created tool that might help the Wikimedia
technical community find stuff more easily. Sometimes relevant information
is buried in IRC chat logs, messages in any of several mailing lists, pages
in mediawiki.org, commit messages, etc. This tool (essentially
On 10/03/13 15:50, Waldir Pimenta wrote:
The motivation for the tool came from a post by Niklas [1], specifically
the section Coping with the proliferation of tools within your community.
In the comments section, Nemo announced his initiative to create a custom
google search to fit at least
On 03/10/2013 10:50 AM, Waldir Pimenta wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to announce a recently created tool that might help the Wikimedia
technical community find stuff more easily. Sometimes relevant information
is buried in IRC chat logs, messages in any of several mailing lists, pages
in
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not convinced about [[en:MediaWiki_talk:*]] and
[[en:Template_talk:*]], they can bring quite a bit of noise (similarly
for [[en:Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)]]). I see how interesting
discussions could be
On 10 March 2013 21:35, Waldir Pimenta wal...@email.com wrote:
Why log them publicly if we don't make them searchable? Either we're
committed to being open or we're not... having a public but hard-to-use
archive seems somewhat contradictory to me.
This is in fact the policy with mailing list
