Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 21 March 2010 22:47, Tim Starling wrote:
>> So filtering is not as trivial as you might think.
>
> How about an anti-flood filter than stops emails that are identical to
> an email sent within the last hour? That ought to stop people
> auto-responding to themselves, at l
Thomas Dalton wrote:
> How about an anti-flood filter than stops emails that are identical to
> an email sent within the last hour? That ought to stop people
> auto-responding to themselves, at least. I think we can live with one
> auto-response per person (which is all most clients send, anyway,
>
On 21 March 2010 22:47, Tim Starling wrote:
> So filtering is not as trivial as you might think.
How about an anti-flood filter than stops emails that are identical to
an email sent within the last hour? That ought to stop people
auto-responding to themselves, at least. I think we can live with o
Chad wrote:
> Rather, can someone fix mailman so these sorts of things
> don't come through? Usually they don't...
Mailman discards posts with the header "Precedence: bulk", which is
set by the classic UNIX autoresponder "vacation". However, there are
many autoresponders which don't set any such h
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
wrote:
> Epic fail!
>
> Someone, block him.
>
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 22:17, wrote:
>
>> This is an auto-replied message. I am out of office right now and will
>> return Thursday March 25, 2010.
>>
>> _
Epic fail!
Someone, block him.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 22:17, wrote:
> This is an auto-replied message. I am out of office right now and will
> return Thursday March 25, 2010.
>
> ___
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https:
This is an auto-replied message. I am out of office right now and will return
Thursday March 25, 2010.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
