Hi Andre,
On Dec 3, 2012, at 7:51 PM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 19:40 +0100, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
Compare e.g.
https://www.ohloh.net/p/mediawiki/contributors?query=sort=commits
Also,
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 23:46 +0100, Platonides wrote:
El 03/12/12 22:45, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona escribió:
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 21:04 +0100, Platonides wrote:
El 03/12/12 19:40, Federico Leva (Nemo) escribió:
That data is hardly useful, it doesn't explain what it refers to
I guess
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 19:40 +0100, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
[...]
Also,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/weekly-bug-summary.cgi?tops=10days=10
proves
they're not talking of the whole bugzilla but then they don't say which
components.
Our mining is for the MediaWiki product. In
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 19:40 +0100, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
That data is hardly useful, it doesn't explain what it refers to and,
even when it does, seems wrong. Compare e.g.
https://www.ohloh.net/p/mediawiki/contributors?query=sort=commits
[...]
ok, some info about this one. It seems
If last October we got a bunch of MediaWiki developer stats thanks to
the aggregation of data by Ohloh [1], now we are getting plenty more
stats from Bitergia, including data from bug reporting and mailing lists:
http://blog.bitergia.com/2012/12/03/complete-basic-analysis-of-mediawiki/
That data is hardly useful, it doesn't explain what it refers to and,
even when it does, seems wrong. Compare e.g.
https://www.ohloh.net/p/mediawiki/contributors?query=sort=commits
Also,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/weekly-bug-summary.cgi?tops=10days=10 proves
they're not talking of the
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 19:40 +0100, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
Compare e.g.
https://www.ohloh.net/p/mediawiki/contributors?query=sort=commits
Also,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/weekly-bug-summary.cgi?tops=10days=10
proves
they're not talking of the whole bugzilla but then they
El 03/12/12 19:40, Federico Leva (Nemo) escribió:
That data is hardly useful, it doesn't explain what it refers to
I agree a glossary of each term would be useful.
It took me a while to realise that committers/closers/senders where the
terms used for users of git/bugzilla/mailing list.
They
El 03/12/12 22:45, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona escribió:
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 21:04 +0100, Platonides wrote:
El 03/12/12 19:40, Federico Leva (Nemo) escribió:
That data is hardly useful, it doesn't explain what it refers to
I guess I missed your message, Federico.
He forgot to keep you in
