Okay, I'm not sure how to get the formatting quite right... but here
is a sample:
'''{{Smallcaps| Average}}''' (numbers)
# total = 0
# '''for''' number ∈ numbers '''do'''
#: total = total + number
# '''end for'''
# return numbers / {{Smallcaps | Length}}(numbers)
this isn't *too* bad to write..
Okay, I've played around a bit with my wiki and unicode. It is indeed
the best option. Resized text looks nice, and for my purposes this
works quite well. Inserting the unicode text is a bit of a pain,
since right now I am copying and pasting the text... but I recently
found that there are entit
On 06/30/2010 09:32 PM, Ilmari Karonen wrote:
> On 06/30/2010 06:14 AM, Adrien Guillon wrote:
>> I've perused wikipedia a
>> bit, and I really don't like how algorithms look there. The appeal of
>> the use of LaTeX, is mostly for the use of boolean algebra and set
>> theory symbols although so
On 06/30/2010 06:14 AM, Adrien Guillon wrote:
> I've perused wikipedia a
> bit, and I really don't like how algorithms look there. The appeal of
> the use of LaTeX, is mostly for the use of boolean algebra and set
> theory symbols although sometimes other symbols like floor or
> ceiling would
My research has come up with a much better package than algorithmic,
the styles for "Introduction to Algorithms" is available at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~thc/clrscode/. I've perused wikipedia a
bit, and I really don't like how algorithms look there. The appeal of
the use of LaTeX, is mostly f
On 29 June 2010 19:58, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Ilmari Karonen wrote:
>> I'm not familiar enough with the texvc code to know what it would take
>> to add support for the algorithmic package (and I'm not sure if anyone
>> really is; that code is notoriously low on act
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Ilmari Karonen wrote:
> I'm not familiar enough with the texvc code to know what it would take
> to add support for the algorithmic package (and I'm not sure if anyone
> really is; that code is notoriously low on active maintainers).
It should be trivial. Just ad
On 06/25/2010 07:31 PM, Adrien Guillon wrote:
>
> I would really really love to have the ability to use the algorithmic
> package inside MediaWiki software. I am writing up the details of a
> bunch of algorithms, and so far I have found it extremely painful to
> do. If there is a better way to ma
Hello all,
I would really really love to have the ability to use the algorithmic
package inside MediaWiki software. I am writing up the details of a
bunch of algorithms, and so far I have found it extremely painful to
do. If there is a better way to make my algorithms look beautiful,
I'd love to
