Hi,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Awesome :) Probably also worth adding a quick box to suggest
a rename of the page when it's imported.
Added.
I think doing it this way
is kind of neat, especially if there's an easy way to see all the
content that's
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
We need to identify which documentation should and should not be
migrated over when it occurs, as there is a lot of documentation that
is old/inaccurate
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Guillaume Paumier
gpaum...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Rob Moen has been working on a simple JS tool that facilitates the
tagging process. Basically, instead of manually tagging the pages with
a different template for each action (archive, delete, keep), there's
a
Indeed, why we need to separate it? We should separate docs for
applications, for server configuration and such, categories are fine
to do that. But there is no need to separate wmf projects and
community projects.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
Namespaces are
I'm not sure if it makes sense to have the Labs/OpenStack/Nova management
interface on this same new wikitech wiki though. This means that all the
community projects running inside labs will/might use this same wiki to
document
their internal structure - which can (and should be) a lot of
On Jun 7, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Ryan Lane wrote:
I'm not sure if it makes sense to have the Labs/OpenStack/Nova management
interface on this same new wikitech wiki though. This means that all the
community projects running inside labs will/might use this same wiki to
document
their internal
I don't understand why? Wikitech is a perfect place for bots
documentation as well, especially when it comes to large bots operated
by many people, these needs to have documentation so that they can be
overtaken by someone else in case the original person who launched
bot, doesn't have a time to
There is a difference between wikimedia projects which are somehow
related to wikimedia projects, and foundation projects which are
funded by foundation. But this difference is only about people and
money, so why should we have a different wiki for that
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Petr Bena
I wanted to say volunteer projects which are affiliated with various
wikimedia projects
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a difference between wikimedia projects which are somehow
related to wikimedia projects, and foundation projects which are
funded
I agree with Petr, I see no reason to put them on different wikis.
Namespaces are cheap.
-Chad
On Jun 7, 2012 11:20 AM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand why? Wikitech is a perfect place for bots
documentation as well, especially when it comes to large bots operated
by
Chad wrote:
I agree with Petr, I see no reason to put them on different wikis.
Namespaces are cheap.
Namespaces are usually a pain in the ass. Sj's post on the subject:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikimedia.orgdiff=365735
6oldid=3657294#Separating_the_wheat_from_the_chaff.
Namespaces are usually a pain in the ass. Sj's post on the subject:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikimedia.orgdiff=365735
6oldid=3657294#Separating_the_wheat_from_the_chaff.
From his post: ... but that would address many of the reasons that people
fragment what are
There's been some conversation about this in the past (not sure which mailing
list). Yes, we should definitly centralize documentation about these into one
wiki:
* Documentation of production cluster (e.g. 'fenari', 'srv###', 'db###',
upload/scalers, squids etc. )
* Wikimedia engineering projects
On 7 June 2012 00:08, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, a general note: Beware that you doesn't confuse beta with
Wikimedia
Labs. beta is one of many projects hosted inside the Labs environment.
The
beta project is a virtual clone of the production cluster. Any
documentation
Hi,
I heard that there was a plan to merge these wikis to one central wiki
for technical documentation for various projects on wikimedia, what is
the current status of that? Are we going to merge it to labsconsole,
or to wikitech? There are some services atm running on labs and
documentation is
I heard that there was a plan to merge these wikis to one central wiki
for technical documentation for various projects on wikimedia, what is
the current status of that? Are we going to merge it to labsconsole,
or to wikitech? There are some services atm running on labs and
documentation is
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
I heard that there was a plan to merge these wikis to one central wiki
for technical documentation for various projects on wikimedia, what is
the current status of that? Are we going to merge it to labsconsole,
or to wikitech?
I'd be happy to help, however wikitech is restricted wiki, so I guess
I can't really help there, anyway I think it would be best if current
wikitech was kept for historical purposes, and in case we forgot to
move something you could find it in, wikitech-historical.wikimedia.org
or similar url
On
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd be happy to help, however wikitech is restricted wiki, so I guess
I can't really help there, anyway I think it would be best if current
wikitech was kept for historical purposes, and in case we forgot to
move something you
Ok, if there is any stuff that can be done on wikitech like
categorization of pages etc I could help with that, but otherwise I
have no idea how I could be useful on that wiki, I have barely any
knowledge of production. What exactly did you mean by community
support
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:11
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, if there is any stuff that can be done on wikitech like
categorization of pages etc I could help with that, but otherwise I
have no idea how I could be useful on that wiki, I have barely any
knowledge of production. What
21 matches
Mail list logo
