Re: [Wikitech-l] New RfC: server-side Javascript error logging

2014-07-28 Thread Nuria
> I would probably recommend using the existing EventLogging infrastructure > for sending the data to our back end, assuming it won't explode under heavy > load spikes... Which it might. :) Eventlogging is not the best choice. Besides not handling bursts of traffic it is -currently- a tier-2 servi

Re: [Wikitech-l] New RfC: server-side Javascript error logging

2014-07-25 Thread Strainu
2014-07-25 1:13 GMT+03:00 Gergo Tisza : > > > Many sites solve this issue by setting up an error handler in Javascript > which reports any errors that occurred to a logging server. I tried to make > a laundry list of things that need to be done or considered if we want to > set up such logging for

Re: [Wikitech-l] New RfC: server-side Javascript error logging

2014-07-24 Thread Brion Vibber
I would probably recommend using the existing EventLogging infrastructure for sending the data to our back end, assuming it won't explode under heavy load spikes... Which it might. :) -- Brion On Jul 24, 2014 3:14 PM, "Gergo Tisza" wrote: > Hi all, > > frontend development is greatly hindered by

[Wikitech-l] New RfC: server-side Javascript error logging

2014-07-24 Thread Gergo Tisza
Hi all, frontend development is greatly hindered by not having logs of errors that happen in production. If there is a mistake in a PHP file, it is usually quickly caught after deployment when a large number of exceptions show up in the error log. If the mistake is in a JS file, it can take a long