On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not use what we already use: REL1_20 etc.
At the time, I thought it might conflict with something. However,
you're probably right and it'll be easier to remember :)
I've now tagged all extensions (that existed) when
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not use what we already use: REL1_20 etc.
At the time, I thought it might conflict with something. However,
you're probably right and it'll be
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 7, 2013, at 8:03 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking we configure $wgExtDistBranches as follows:
$wgExtDistBranches = array(
'master',
'SNAPSHOT-for-1.21',
'SHAPSHOT-for-1.20',
...
);
We
Hello extension developers, extension users, and people who hate NFS:
I'm finishing up rewriting ExtensionDistributor[0] so it'll be more reliable
and not rely on NFS. In the process of doing this, I've changed how
it fetches the archives. Instead of cloning all of the repositories and
generating
On Jan 7, 2013, at 8:03 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking we configure $wgExtDistBranches as follows:
$wgExtDistBranches = array(
'master',
'SNAPSHOT-for-1.21',
'SHAPSHOT-for-1.20',
...
);
We can go ahead and create tags for the existing released versions
to
