Thanks Siko.
Also, @Brian: the last I heard is that the Committee would like more
members with software development experience. If that sounds like something
you would want to do, I think that the committee coordinators or Marti
would like to hear from you about joining IEGCom for the next round
(
Useful points as always, thanks! Marti and Quim have partnered on improving
processes for technical IEG proposals and there's no doubt still room for
improvement, but always good to have feedback as they're building changes
into each round. Having separate application templates for different kinds
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 21:05 -0600, Brian Wolff wrote:
> It would be nice if before asking for general review, the proposals
> were vetted to have sufficient detail. Some of these seem to be "I
> want X$ to do Y, and I'm not going to tell you how I plan to do Y, or
> how I determined X$ is needed, o
I would mention that in your comments.
Pinging Siko to see if she wants to share a grantmaker's perspective. (Siko
is dealing with some of the fallout from Wikimaniagate, so I'm not sure if
she will respond.)
Pine
On Oct 6, 2015 9:10 PM, "Brian Wolff" wrote:
> I feel that way about all of them,
I feel that way about all of them, except maybe StrepHit and
Vietnamese categories (Pan-Scandinavian lang is on the border imo)
I feel like the only things really being assessed here is the
reputation of the author, if the funding is orders of magnitude
off-base, if the goal is remotely in scope o
Disclaimer: I was a founding member of IEGCom, for a time I was one of its
coordinators, and I currently have a grant proposal for this round of IEGs.
Comment: if you think that a proposal needs further development before
funding it, please say so on that proposal's talk page. When I was on the
Co
On 10/6/15, Chris Schilling wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Applicants for the current round of Individual Engagement Grants (IEG) have
> submitted many proposals that involve new tools, bot tasks, and other
> technical elements. I’ve provided the list of these proposals and brief
> descriptions below.
>
Hey folks,
Applicants for the current round of Individual Engagement Grants (IEG) have
submitted many proposals that involve new tools, bot tasks, and other
technical elements. I’ve provided the list of these proposals and brief
descriptions below.
Your feedback in these technical proposals is r
