On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 00:38, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com wrote:
It's interesting that the #1 con against Git in that document is Lots
of annoying Git/Linux fanboys.
No, it's the screaming 'hell yeah!' but have no idea what they're
talking about part. :-)
g
I believe we've had two discussions in the past on switching to git.
I talked to Tim about various other advantages of .git, like the lack of
autoprops annoyance, and corrected the notion that there isn't a Windows
client and his reponse was maybe in a year or two.
Generally the limitation is
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 21:13, Daniel Friesen li...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
I believe we've had two discussions in the past on switching to git.
I talked to Tim about various other advantages of .git, like the lack of
autoprops annoyance, and corrected the notion that there isn't a Windows
Since there are some talks about migration from SVN anyway[1], I
decided to unshelf my essay on this matter.[2] It discusses possible
alternatives to Subversion and is in no way complete, everyone is
invited to participate in drafting and discussing. Some sections need
input of those who have
2009/9/5 Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru:
* Marco Schuster ma...@harddisk.is-a-geek.org [Sat, 5 Sep 2009
If Windows had a decent command line / shell (has its suckyness
improved
for
Win7?), I bet that TortoiseSVN had far less downloads... it simply is
the
only way to make SVN usable on
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:34 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
[subject changed]
2009/9/5 Marco Schuster ma...@harddisk.is-a-geek.org:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Wheee! TortoiseSVN indeed spoils us Windows users, as it's made
version
