Mark Holmquist wrote:
> (I'm leaving out arguments about the decision to host with Google, but
> it seems like a relevant thing, perhaps there are archived discussions
> that I could read?)
The Wikimedia Foundation's decision to switch to Google Apps came up on
foundation-l in October 2010. The re
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Mark Holmquist wrote:
>> That's nice, but as a business decision the wikimedia foundation has
>> decided to host our corporate email with Google. For personal mail we
>> all have the choice of whatever system we would like, but this
>> business decision has been ma
That's nice, but as a business decision the wikimedia foundation has
decided to host our corporate email with Google. For personal mail we
all have the choice of whatever system we would like, but this
business decision has been made for us, and if someone wants a
wikimedia.org address, I don't t
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mark Holmquist wrote:
>> As true as all this is, some of us would prefer to keep an advertising
>> giant like Google out of our business as much as possible.
>
>
> Or alternatively, a non-free software giant like Google. But it comes to
> roughly the same conclusion
As true as all this is, some of us would prefer to keep an advertising
giant like Google out of our business as much as possible.
Or alternatively, a non-free software giant like Google. But it comes to
roughly the same conclusion.
--
Mark Holmquist
Contractor, Wikimedia Foundation
mtrac...@m
On 09/01/2012 04:01 PM, Antoine Musso wrote:
> Le 31/08/12 22:43, Mark A. Hershberger a écrit :
>> But in an organization like the Foundation, you'll come across
>> volunteers, etc., who would prefer to use Google as little as possible.
>> I make my own attempts at this (which is why I run my own
Le 31/08/12 22:43, Mark A. Hershberger a écrit :
> But in an organization like the Foundation, you'll come across
> volunteers, etc., who would prefer to use Google as little as possible.
> I make my own attempts at this (which is why I run my own email server
> for my friends and family).
Note t
Andrew suggested giving them Google apps accounts. I think it's a great
solution--it allows people to use gmail or pretty much any mail client
they want.
However, it forces them to use the google mail servers, which may be
less-than-desirable for some of us (me included) for various reasons.
B
On 31/08/12 22:31, Jeff Green wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
>
>> On 08/31/2012 04:01 PM, Jeff Green wrote:
>>> We are currently stuck at the step of mapping out how we originate mail
>>> for the whitelist. Production and Google Apps mail are easy. But people
>>> say we m
On 08/31/2012 04:31 PM, Jeff Green wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
>> I'm not why you couldn't give volunteers, etc. a server to send from and
>> add that IP to your trusted senders for the domain that they use
>> (assuming they're using one of your domains for their email
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
On 08/31/2012 04:01 PM, Jeff Green wrote:
We are currently stuck at the step of mapping out how we originate mail
for the whitelist. Production and Google Apps mail are easy. But people
say we may have volunteers, board members, etc. who do not us
On 08/31/2012 04:01 PM, Jeff Green wrote:
> We are currently stuck at the step of mapping out how we originate mail
> for the whitelist. Production and Google Apps mail are easy. But people
> say we may have volunteers, board members, etc. who do not use our known
> mail routes.
I'm not why you co
that should read "survey and reconfigure any outliers"
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Jeff Green wrote:
I still think it's a very good idea to deploy both SPF and domainkeys. SPF
keeps coming up--twice this week from completely different quarters. Today
the mailhouse we hired to help with the fundraiser
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Derric Atzrott
wrote:
> Forgive me for not knowing, but what is OIT? A quick Google gives me Oregon
> Institute of Technology, but I that is it given the context.
>
Wikimedia's Office IT department.
Roan
___
Wikitech-l
>I still think it's a very good idea to deploy both SPF and domainkeys. SPF
>keeps coming up--twice this week from completely different quarters. Today
>the mailhouse we hired to help with the fundraiser tells me our
>deliverability with one major ISP is poor because we lack SPF.
>
>We are curre
I still think it's a very good idea to deploy both SPF and domainkeys. SPF
keeps coming up--twice this week from completely different quarters. Today
the mailhouse we hired to help with the fundraiser tells me our
deliverability with one major ISP is poor because we lack SPF.
We are currently
On 31/08/12 04:15, Daniel Friesen wrote:
> This brings up the question.
> Why does wikimedia.org not have a SPF record?
>
> We should be rejecting wikimedia.org emails that we know do not come
> from Wikimedia.
In May, Jeff Green proposed deploying it with "softfail", but it
wasn't ever actually
This brings up the question.
Why does wikimedia.org not have a SPF record?
We should be rejecting wikimedia.org emails that we know do not come from
Wikimedia.
--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:19:52 -0700, Akshay Agarwal
wro
This is definitely a fraud message, checked it on various scamming sites
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 8:45 PM, wrote:
> I would like to take this time to welcome you to our hiring process
> and give you a brief synopsis of the position's benefits and requirements.
>
> If you are taking a career break
19 matches
Mail list logo
