Re: [Wikitech-l] flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org Status?

2009-09-01 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:17 PM, K. Peachey wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Platonides wrote: >> You know, when you point to a broken page, people^W wikipedians tend to >> do absurd things like fixing them :) > I was going to fix some up, but import is restricted and i was too > lazy to do

Re: [Wikitech-l] flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org Status?

2009-09-01 Thread K. Peachey
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Platonides wrote: > You know, when you point to a broken page, people^W wikipedians tend to > do absurd things like fixing them :) I was going to fix some up, but import is restricted and i was too lazy to do copy/paste imports. -Peachey ___

Re: [Wikitech-l] flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org Status?

2009-09-01 Thread Platonides
Gregory Maxwell wrote: > And it's different now than it was last night, last night the > templates weren't there yet and it looked like a car hit it. :) You know, when you point to a broken page, people^W wikipedians tend to do absurd things like fixing them :) It was me who fixed it, by importin

Re: [Wikitech-l] flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org Status?

2009-09-01 Thread Brion Vibber
On 9/1/09 6:56 AM, Platonides wrote: > We should support shadow wiki copies of mediawiki. > Something like copying the page table and have mediawiki look at the > revision table of the original wiki when needed. > Obviously, the labs login should have read-only access to the production > wiki (it's

Re: [Wikitech-l] flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org Status?

2009-09-01 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:03 AM, K. Peachey wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: >> Seems my concern was moot in any case... Every time I loaded it I've >> only seen trashed pages like this: >> http://flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org/wiki/Super_Smash_Bros._Melee >> >> But I

Re: [Wikitech-l] flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org Status?

2009-09-01 Thread Robert Rohde
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:03 AM, K. Peachey wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: >> Seems my concern was moot in any case... Every time I loaded it I've >> only seen trashed pages like this: >> http://flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org/wiki/Super_Smash_Bros._Melee >> >> But I

Re: [Wikitech-l] flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org Status?

2009-09-01 Thread Platonides
We should support shadow wiki copies of mediawiki. Something like copying the page table and have mediawiki look at the revision table of the original wiki when needed. Obviously, the labs login should have read-only access to the production wiki (it's labs, after all) except perhaps to the user ta

Re: [Wikitech-l] flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org Status?

2009-09-01 Thread K. Peachey
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > Seems my concern was moot in any case... Every time I loaded it I've > only seen trashed pages like this: > http://flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org/wiki/Super_Smash_Bros._Melee > > But I guess this is just a result of the import being incomplet

Re: [Wikitech-l] flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org Status?

2009-09-01 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Chris Down wrote: > Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but simple shouldn't be locked into some sort > of 'testing' agreement with enwp unless there is some sort of consensus on > both sites, and I have little doubt that consensus will not exist for such > an action. > >

Re: [Wikitech-l] flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org Status?

2009-09-01 Thread Chris Down
Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but simple shouldn't be locked into some sort of 'testing' agreement with enwp unless there is some sort of consensus on both sites, and I have little doubt that consensus will not exist for such an action. As I say, perhaps I am misunderstanding. - Chris 2009/8/31

Re: [Wikitech-l] flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org Status?

2009-08-31 Thread Brion Vibber
On 8/31/09 4:34 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > Greetings. > > Can anyone provide a status update regarding flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org ? > > In the future perhaps it would be better to import simple english > Wikipedia for enwp testing: The lack of templates makes the site look > extensively vanda