James Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If they've dual-licensed, perhaps they would be amenable
> to allowing inclusion in Wine under Wine's license - has
> anyone asked them yet??
this is what greg haerr ( microwindows author/maintainer ) had to say:
Mark,
Microwindows (Nano-X ver
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
> > Patrik Stridvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > But by all means link with or borrow whatever you can
> > > from Microwindows in the mean time. Just clearly mark
> > > it in the code we the can fix it later.
> >
> > And be aware that it w
Patrik Stridvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Microwindows is under MPL (alternatively GPL) so it is
> not directly incompatible. What I primarily don't like
> is that either license adds more restrictions.
If it adds restrictions then it's incompatible, because it means you
can no longer distr
> Patrik Stridvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > But by all means link with or borrow whatever you can
> > from Microwindows in the mean time. Just clearly mark
> > it in the code we the can fix it later.
>
> And be aware that it won't be part of the main distribution; I'm not
> including a
Patrik Stridvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But by all means link with or borrow whatever you can
> from Microwindows in the mean time. Just clearly mark
> it in the code we the can fix it later.
And be aware that it won't be part of the main distribution; I'm not
including any code that has
> Patrik Stridvall wrote:
>
> >Another "library" you should look at is Microwindows
> >(http://www.microwindows.org) which under MPL (optionally
> GPL).
>
> >Personally I think that in the long run we are better off
> >having a CPU-only rendering engine of our own. However in
> >t
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, mark dufour wrote:
>
>Patrik Stridvall wrote:
>
>>Another "library" you should look at is Microwindows
>>(http://www.microwindows.org) which under MPL (optionally GPL).
>
>>Personally I think that in the long run we are better off
>>having a CPU-only rendering e
