On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 12:19:10 -0400, you wrote:
On October 19, 2003 11:10 am, Rein Klazes wrote:
Now I spent some time creating EDIT windows, varying parameters (with or
without text), varying styles including multilines even tested the edit
part of a combobox. In all cases the WM_CREATE
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 02:26:53 +0100
Keith Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 23:23:44 +0200
Ivan Leo Murray-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it a patent for a hrdware solution, or for software? If software then in
Europe, at least in Germany and others, it wouldn't
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to make an application work under wine. The app is probably
an MFC app, that defenitely uses MDI. The problem boils down to this -
it tries to create an MDI window by doing SendMessageA to a message of
type
Hi
I hope I'm not stating the obvious here, I'm just trying to help.
I'm trying to find my way around the MDI setting, and phrase a regression test.
However, I cannot seem to create the exact same circumstances. When looking at the
original app using Spy++, I see that the application has a
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 00:19, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
cool trick. an ironic side-note (I have not tried this on my without-nptl
system yet, so the following is not relevant to my problem): on my nptl
system (the one that works now), I get:
# /lib/libc-2.3.2.so
Inconsistency detected by
now that windows drivers will work in linux, can
wine run directx easy? with wine on linux, and having windows drivers, the
wine shouldn't have any troubles whatsoever acting as
windows
I always use OutputDebugString (Win32 API), or TRACE macros under msvc
headers.
Than it shows under the Debugger. And if on-site, Just download for
free the DebugMon application from:
www.sysinternals.com
It will catch and display all your Traces and let you save them to
file and more..
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
I always use OutputDebugString (Win32 API), or TRACE macros under msvc
headers.
Than it shows under the Debugger. And if on-site, Just download for
free the DebugMon application from:
www.sysinternals.com http://www.sysinternals.com
It will catch and display all your
Doesn't help me much when I have sources for neither program nor APIs.
I'm trying to see why a propritery program misbehaves under wine, by comparing it to
Windows. When running it under Windows, I don't have the luxury of OutputDebugString.
What about Spy++ for messages? For system calls
I'm trying to see why a propritery program misbehaves under wine, by comparing it to
Windows. When running it under Windows, I don't have the luxury of OutputDebugString.
Maybe even better:
http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/DLL_Injection_tutorial.asp
Already with a sample about logging
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you send things via the SendMessageA, I would assume they need to
be ANSI. As such, the obvious reasons are that it appears, to my
understanding of things, that this SHOULD fail.
No, it shouldn't. The conversion should take place in the case of
Hello Jan,
Comments are inline.
--- Jan Kratochvil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
As GPLed Linux-NTFS still has no NTFS r/w capability I completed the
project
for reliable r/w access in Wine way by using MS-Windows ntfs.sys
driver.
Captive-NTFS
http://www.jankratochvil.net/
I have
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you send things via the SendMessageA, I would assume they need to
be ANSI. As such, the obvious reasons are that it appears, to my
understanding of things, that this SHOULD fail.
No, it shouldn't. The conversion
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you send things via the SendMessageA, I would assume they need to
be ANSI. As such, the obvious reasons are that it appears, to my
understanding of things, that this SHOULD fail.
No, it shouldn't. The conversion
Hey Danny,
--- Danny Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Small correction. I don't know what they are aiming for. I only
know
what I am aiming for -- and that is to provide a good, affordable
compiler toolset for the ordinary user. The SDK/DDK is a low
priority
for me personally. Right now my
Ok thanks for clearing that up. Since our priority is SDK/DDK we'll
probably be the main submitters of such code then.
Regards
Jason
--- Danny Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jason Filby
The only thing that worries me is Danny saying that they're not
aiming for the Windows SDK/DDK! If
From: Jason Filby
The only thing that worries me is Danny saying that they're not
aiming for the Windows SDK/DDK! If this is true then we may have to
keep our own headers, public or otherwise?
Small correction. I don't know what they are aiming for. I only know
what I am aiming for -- and
A .tar.gz containing HTML tables of imports and exports for windows dlls
is now available here: http://24.229.94.2/import_export_tables.tar.gz
It is about 1MB but it will decompress to 1000+ html files and 58MB! I
have not included empty tables where a dll does not import or export any
Wine can't load windows drivers. This may be possible in a very very far future,
but it would probably be easier to write native drivers. Probably by the time
wine can do such a thing, all hardware vendors will support linux anyway.
Hans Leidekker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It appears that the comctl32 conformance test calls functions by name
that are exported by ordinal only on Windows. Still the test runs (and
thus run-time links) on Wine. Is this wanted behavior?
Yes it is, the functions are converted to ordinal
I currently write a small desktop app (in case you are curious
http://sourceforge.net/projects/launchmenu) and for this I have to research on
how to grab mouse events and eventually keyboard as well. Now I thought that
this might be usefull for wine when playing games under the DirectX emulation,
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case anyone is interested - http://shemesh.biz/winetrace.bz2
Again unicows.dll (Microsoft Layer for Unicode) plays bad games
with Wine. Could you regenerate the log with additional +snoop?
--
Dmitry.
On October 20, 2003 02:55 am, Rein Klazes wrote:
I cannot imagine the conformance here to be accidentally lost. I am
not against conformance tests in general, but to protect such simple
one-line functionality seems to me a waste of the effort.
Right, but the test would also tell us if all
On October 20, 2003 01:49 am, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Do you mean I need to write some test program? I do have one, written in
Delphi. I can send it in, or put on the web site and post a link here.
Only it's not exactly nice program. Just something to test few things
about tab control. Here
Monday, October 20, 2003, 10:13:12 PM, you wrote:
On October 20, 2003 01:49 am, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Do you mean I need to write some test program? I do have one, written in
Delphi. I can send it in, or put on the web site and post a link here.
Only it's not exactly nice program. Just
On October 21, 2003 12:43 am, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
I'm not exactly sure how such a test will work. It involves graphical
components. Unless there are some way to make test see what's on the screen
I can't think of a way how to do this.
Right, graphical tests are tricky, and it's not clear
26 matches
Mail list logo
