While making the Debian package, I had to do a special hack to compile
wine's documentation because it's made seperately.
This isn't a really big deal, but what I did realize is that Wine's
documentation doesn't get installed to the help menu now coming standard
on systems.
When I select Applicat
No. I used the InstallShield program for Flash MX, and it didn't work. Without
stdole32.tlb, it whined like a baby about OLE. With stdole32.tlb, it (not the
whole system) froze up during the "preparing" stage when it hit 100% and left a
phantom window that was blank when and after I quit Wine. I
Hi Vincent,
--- Vincent Béron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Was the resulting stdole32.tlb file (generated on Wine) a suitable
> replacement for Microsoft's? IE, does InstallShield works better with
> this file than without any stdole32.tlb file?
I think it will work. One thing we have discussed i
> Task 4:
> Try updating the menu mapping code to support the new XDG menu
> specification. Don't bother trying to make this work everywhere, it's a
> total nightmare. Just try supporting the new standards. Be warned: not
> every desktop/distro supports this yet!
>
> This one might be quite hard.
Le dim 29/08/2004 à 14:31, Filip Navara a écrit :
> Huw D M Davies wrote:
>
> >You're right, an MSFT stdole32 might work fine - I guess we should at
> >least try it. So for fun I've attached the program we used to
> >generate CrossOver's stdole32.tlb (Actually you need to take the
> >generated fi
In the reports page the link to the tests points to
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/CrossBuilt/winetest-200411251000.exe
and this is probably what the server tells winrash to download, but it returns a
404.
The test actually is at
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/CrossBuilt/win
> Also runned ldconfig (don't know if that is
> a must).
It isn't, expecially if you run out of the source tree.
Ivan.
Libero ADSL: navighi gratis a 1.2 Mega, senza canone e costi di attivazione.
Abbonati subito su http://www.libero
Another task: Get xscreensaver to respect the registry LowPowerActive setting.
Ivan.
Libero ADSL: navighi gratis a 1.2 Mega, senza canone e costi di attivazione.
Abbonati subito su http://www.libero.it
I would like to know why
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2004/11/0171.html hasn't been
accepted.
Rémi Assailly wrote:
I added some things to my previous patch.
Please tell me if something seems incorrect or is missing
Thanks ;)
Changelog:
* implement GetLayout
Thanks for spotting another one for my growing heap of BiDi TODOs
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2584
Shachar
--
S
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 08:35 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi - probably my first comment after lurking here for a few weeks. Is
> there anything that a user type (I'm not a developer in any sense) can
> do in this area?
I'm afraid they nearly all involve patching Wine, so not with this set
of sugges
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:47:18 +0100, Robert van Herk wrote:
> I added a new function SHBrowseForUNIXDirectory in brsfolder.c and added
> it to shlobj.h. Reinstalled the shlobj.h, compiled the shell32.dll, and
> installed that new one too. Also runned ldconfig (don't know if that is
> a must).
I
Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
Mike McCormack wrote:
...
so long as you are the sole author.
That's where part of the problem is: as long as someone sends me just a
"Ctrl-arrow" patch, I can always be suspected of stealing that patch. It
puts me in a very uncomfortable position.
Perhaps a suggestion.
Never mind,
doing a new make from the root directory of the wine source solved it...
Robert
Robert van Herk wrote:
Mike Hearn wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 17:02:05 +0100, Robert van Herk wrote:
Ofcourse, but the api call SHBrowseForFolder returns a pidl. So
making unix browsing an extra flag woul
Mike Hearn wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 17:02:05 +0100, Robert van Herk wrote:
Ofcourse, but the api call SHBrowseForFolder returns a pidl. So making
unix browsing an extra flag wouldn't be useful, if I couldn't return a
valid pidl in the unix case.
Hmm, I guess perhaps it is best to make an ex
Jesse Allen a écrit :
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 10:23:41PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok, how about this patch?
It does basically two things:
- it makes the x86 version of ptrace be a lot more careful about the TF
bit in eflags, and in particular it never touches it _unless_ the
tracer has ex
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:56:37 +, Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:18:34 +0100, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> > Another suggestion, probably a bigger task: Look for common native
> > applications and write entries for them into the registry.
>
> Yep! Here's another sugge
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 17:02:05 +0100, Robert van Herk wrote:
> Ofcourse, but the api call SHBrowseForFolder returns a pidl. So making
> unix browsing an extra flag wouldn't be useful, if I couldn't return a
> valid pidl in the unix case.
>
> Hmm, I guess perhaps it is best to make an extra api fun
Mike Hearn wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 10:37:10 +0100, Robert van Herk wrote:
Thus, if I'd make an extra flag in the dialog, I would have to extent
pidls to, so that they can hold unix paths. Is that a wise thing to do?
Or should I take another approach?
Hmm, I'm not sure you want to do th
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:18:34 +0100, Stefan DÃsinger wrote:
> Another suggestion, probably a bigger task: Look for common native
> applications and write entries for them into the registry.
Yep! Here's another suggestion. Keep them coming guys! :)
- Implement a bridge between the Windows registr
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:04:49PM -0500, Jacek Caban wrote:
> > I saw in TODO list "Get rid of the list of DLLs, it's too big, and adds
> > too little information",
> > so I thought it could be moved into separated file dlls/DLL-LIST.
>
> I thin
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "make install && make install_debuginfo" will install the debugging
> info both embedded and separate.
> "make install_debuginfo && make install" will only install the separate.
> This is one of the quirks I would like some feedback on and no doubt
> s
> I'm sitting waiting for a couple of compiles to finish, so I thought I'd
> put together a list of fun/interesting tasks people might like to have a
> go at related to better integrating Wine with the native desktop.
>
> None of these should be especially hard, and so would provide a good intro
>
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 11:54:47 +0900, Hajime Segawa wrote:
> I changed the install script a bit and it does not depend on DCOM98,
> MFC4.0, etc... anymore.
> So, you can run IE6 completely out-of-box.
>
> New script is here :
> http://sidenet.ddo.jp/winetips/files/wine-config-sidenet-1.5.3.tgz
Quic
Mike Hearn wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 20:37:21 +, Aneurin Price wrote:
Thanks for that; it's just the kind of comment I was looking for.
It wasn't a full patch as I wasn't planning to get it applied, and a
number of points were where I copied code from what was there already
:), but you even
25 matches
Mail list logo