Re: XEmbed Systray Support

On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 11:32 +0530, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote: > I have to Julliard regarding this, he still thinks that there should > be some more work to be done on it. He did not mentioned what work is > to be done. Yeah, I have as well. He's yet to return my e-mail on that one. > Well you shoul

Re: XEmbed Systray Support

I have to Julliard regarding this, he still thinks that there should be some more work to be done on it. He did not mentioned what work is to be done. Well you should also see that if any one closes a systray application, any wine process should not be present after closing the app. Please check wi

Re: [wininet]add implementation of few more options - try5

Hi Vijay, > You told me to cleanup if the connection fails, i could not understand > how to clean up. (snip) > Please suggest me how to improve the tests, i have removed the ok and > the cruft for if(hurl == 0x0) That's all I wanted :) Thanks for taking the time to improve your tests. > Could y

Re: [wininet]add implementation of few more options - try5

Juan: You told me to cleanup if the connection fails, i could not understand how to clean up. If you could suggest me an example to do a clean up, it would be gr8. I just copied some stuff from tests of http.c Please suggest me how to improve the tests, i have removed the ok and the cruft for if(h

Re: Regression: Winrar fails to start

Well, I was thinking that since we really dont want to mess with Xorg security fixes, maybe there is some sort of a workaround that could be written into wine? I dunno, perhaps a temporary dirty hack to fix it until Xorg fixes X again? Unless there isnt any way to work around it of course, an

Re: kernel/comm.c - page fault in thread

Uwe Bonnes wrote: "Cihan" == Cihan Altinay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Cihan> Uwe Bonnes wrote: >>> "Cihan" == Cihan ALTINAY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Cihan> Hi again, Sorry for the double post and the stupid default Cihan> From-Header (not my machine). I replaced

Re: [wininet]add implementation of few more options - try5

"Vijay Kiran Kamuju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > as previous implementation had some bugs use this version and > implements some suggestions > more tests to come > > ChangeLog > > Added implementation for INTERNET_OPTION_VERSION > Added implementation for INTERNET_OPTION_USE

privileged instruction in 32-bit code

Hello, I'm looking for a little help to find the next step in getting a program (Everquest 2) working under wine. It currently runs the patcher, and will go through the load screen, and when the game comes up I get: WineDbg starting on pid 0x8 Unhandled exception: privileged instruction in 3

Re: Small CVS-Update-Script

just edit the CVSROOT-Variable to ":pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/wine" with you favourite editor and you're ready to go. This Script does not have complex parameter-handlings - the configuration-area is on the top of the script. Have a look at it and you will see that everything can be set up th

Re: XEmbed Systray Support

On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 15:26 +0530, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote: > I have tested googletalk with the patch of yours, i am attaching the > screenshot of it. > whenever i ve closed an googletalk instance its present on the screen > (in the picture i have labelled it as zombie), in ps -ef its not > killin

Re: [user] static.c: PaintIcon fix background colour

On 11/10/05, Michael Kaufmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've already created a little test program: Windows draws the background > behind the icon, but not the entire client area. It should be easy to > modify the existing code. Yes, I see what you are talking about now. > > Your second patch

Re: [user] static.c: PaintIcon fix background colour

On 11/10/05, Michael Kaufmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Kieran, > > Icons can have transparent and inverted pixels! This patch is not > correct, the background has to be painted always. > The current functionality is not correct either then. It works ok for a normal SS_ICON, but if you use S

Re: compile error: server/event.c

Hali! This little patch answer a problem. (This is my first patch please check it!) Regards, Geri_ - ? patch.diff Index: include/winternl.h === RCS

Re: [user] static.c: PaintIcon fix background colour

Hi, The current functionality is not correct either then. It works ok for a normal SS_ICON, but if you use SS_CENTERIMAGE with it, it paints the background around the icon where there should be no background. I will experiment with transparent icons and improve my patch. Thankyou for the info.

Re: [user] static.c: PaintIcon fix background colour

Hi Kieran, Icons can have transparent and inverted pixels! This patch is not correct, the background has to be painted always. * dlls/user/static.c: Kieran Clancy > Only set background for icon control when the icon is invalid. Regards, Mi

Re: OSDL's Desktop Linux architects meeting

> I think it would be a great if someone from Wine could attend, but > given that it's in Portland I'm not sure anyone is nearby. Would it > be possible to set up a conference phone to call into for a session or > two? I'm thinking the most useful thing to hear would be the > freedesktop.org sess

Re: [msvcrt] I64 and ll support

On 11/8/05, Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Changelog: > - add I64 modifier support on msvcrt *printf functions > - correct ll modifier support on msvcrt *printf functions > - correct tests > > this should correct bug 3759 and 2075 (and many others) > > Now for libc who don't sup

A small bounty for fixing a bug

Hi there. I want to offer 100 EUR for a fix for bug #1973. It's not much, and I have no idea how complicated the bug is to fix, but maybe it's only trivial problem. A demo is available for download, and I guess most comments in the bugreport are wrong/ irrelevant anyway. So, if anyone is intere

Re: Small CVS-Update-Script

Hi, On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:18:42PM +0100, Christian Lachner wrote: > OK, this is version 3.5 which is mainly an Bugfix-Update to version 0.3. For such a colorful and monstrous script it's "interesting" to see that it doesn't even support our CVS mirror server out of the box... (which should be

Re: Wine API Documentation

On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 05:31 -0600, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > *It appears that this was previously generated at release time by the > > wine_release script (http://cvs.winehq.org/cvsweb/tools/wine_release), > > but was disabled over 2 years ago.

Re: Regression: Winrar fails to start

Hmm, i thought you were talking about the BadAlloc-Problem and i noticed that audiograbber does not start because of that. Did i misunderstand something? I'm not a dev so i don't understand your fix... ciao chrisOn 11/9/05, Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:24:4

Re: Small CVS-Update-Script

OK, this is version 3.5 which is mainly an Bugfix-Update to version 0.3. Functionality is just the same but it fixes a bad bug, has a colorful output and changed some minor stuff. This Release is meant to be stable. Lets do some testing ;). For most people it should work out of the box... have fun

Re: OSDL's Desktop Linux architects meeting

On 11/9/05, Robert Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On December 1-2, OSDL is hosting a meeting for the desktop architects from > the various Linux desktop organizations to help decide on ways to improve > and promote Linux on the Desktop. An electronic copy of the invitation can I think it

OSDL's Desktop Linux architects meeting

On December 1-2, OSDL is hosting a meeting for the desktop architects from the various Linux desktop organizations to help decide on ways to improve and promote Linux on the Desktop. An electronic copy of the invitation can be found at the following URL. This contains a full agenda, preparation inf

Re: msvcrt _tempnam and tests

> "Phil" == Phil Lodwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Phil> I submitted a patch yesterday for the implementation of _tempnam Phil> in msvcrt. Today I started to write a conformance test which has Phil> led to several questions. Phil> 1) What action should we take if MS documen

Re: msvcrt _tempnam and tests

From: "Phil Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 1) What action should we take if MS documentation and the implementation do > not agree? just test to implementation. > 2) If a function takes several parameters, do you test all permutations, or > just the ones you feel are important? As much as possib

Re: dlls/include/list.h: remove_list() failed when removing first or last element

Markus Gömmel wrote: Sometimes resulted in an exception when AllocHeap() was called... Regards Markus Goemmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry, but the patch is wrong. The Wine list implementation makes sure that next and prev are always valid pointers, such that the list is circular. The only w

msvcrt _tempnam and tests

I submitted a patch yesterday for the implementation of _tempnam in msvcrt. Today I started to write a conformance test which has led to several questions. 1) What action should we take if MS documentation and the implementation do not agree? a) leave out the test b) test to imple

MindManager Viewer

Hi! I have tried to get the MindManager Viewer installed but without success. I have used version 0.9 of wine (self-compiled) which results in the following messages (calling /opt/wine-0.9/bin/wine M60-G-643_Viewer.exe): fixme:win:SetWindowTextA cannot set text ": Setup.INI" of other process wi

Wine Conf 2004

Hi folks, I've added a stub page for Wine Conf 2004: http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2004 It would be nice if somebody spends some time to document what we did there before we completely forget (similar to the other WineConf200[25] pages). It is part of our history, and would be a pitty to no

Re: [wininet]add implementation of few more options - try5

Hi Vijay, + hurl = InternetConnectA(hinet,"www.winehq.com",INTERNET_DEFAULT_HTTP_PORT,NULL,NULL,INTERNET_SERVICE_HTTP,0,0); + ok((hurl != 0x0),"InternetConnect Failed\n"); + + if( hurl == 0x0) + { + InternetCloseHandle(hurl); + InternetCloseHandle(hinet); + return; + } The ok a

Re: Regression: Winrar fails to start

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:24:43PM +0100, Christian Lachner wrote: > Also got that Problem with Audiograbber... Other programs are surely also > affected by this problem > > On 11/9/05, Dustin Navea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Can I get someone to take a look at > > http://bugs.winehq.org/s

Re: Regression: Winrar fails to start

Also got that Problem with Audiograbber... Other programs are surely also affected by this problemOn 11/9/05, Dustin Navea < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Can I get someone to take a look at http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3573 ?  This seems to affect only  users of Xorg, and it seems to affect a

Regression: Winrar fails to start

Can I get someone to take a look at http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3573 ? This seems to affect only users of Xorg, and it seems to affect all of them, in multiple different programs.. Dustin

Re: kernel/comm.c - page fault in thread

> "Cihan" == Cihan Altinay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Cihan> Uwe Bonnes wrote: >>> "Cihan" == Cihan ALTINAY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Cihan> Hi again, Sorry for the double post and the stupid default Cihan> From-Header (not my machine). I replaced my modified com

Re: RESEND [wininet]add implementation of few more options

About uninitalizing the length variable, if the tests bomb in windows, dont ask me. well i will put them in anew patch once this gets accepted. i have still some more tests and implementation to go. This is just the beggining. Thanks, Vijay PS: - Why this always happens to me :( . On 11/9/05,

Re: RESEND [wininet]add implementation of few more options

"Vijay Kiran Kamuju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In your Last suggestion if i initialize the length variable in the > > > tests, the native simply gives garbage, thats inorder to make the test > > > pass. > > > I too dont know much about how use the wininet apis, i just wrote a > simple test

Re: Wine benchmarks

On 11/9/05, Hans Kristian Rosbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark is getting old, and an update using > version 0.9 would be ideal. Any chance at getting an update using > the same computer as before? Sure, it may be a couple days, I plan to update that page soon. >

Re: Wine API Documentation

Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > *It appears that this was previously generated at release time by the > wine_release script (http://cvs.winehq.org/cvsweb/tools/wine_release), > but was disabled over 2 years ago. I was wondering what the reason was, > but I guess it is that it take

Re: [wined3d] GL_EXT_framebuffer_object and Mesa detection

Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Index: ../../include/wine/wined3d_gl.h > RCS file: /home/wine/wine/include/wine/wined3d_gl.h,v > retrieving revision 1.11 > diff -u -r1.11 wined3d_gl.h > -- ../../include/wine/wined3d_gl.h28 Sep 2005 18:12:00 - 1.11 > +++ ../../include/wine/wined3

Re: Wine API Documentation

On 11/9/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:38:19 +0100, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > We don't really want the WineHQ web server to be running at 100% CPU > > for ~20 minutes while it builds the API documentation. > > couldn't it just be

Re: kernel/comm.c - page fault in thread

Uwe Bonnes wrote: "Cihan" == Cihan ALTINAY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Cihan> Hi again, Sorry for the double post and the stupid default Cihan> From-Header (not my machine). I replaced my modified comm.c with Cihan> the latest CVS, made the changes as described below and still got

Wine benchmarks

http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark is getting old, and an update using version 0.9 would be ideal. Any chance at getting an update using the same computer as before? A little before & after comparison would also be nice. -A page for Wine 0.9 vs Windows (like today) -Another for Wine 0.9 vs Wine 2005

Re: XEmbed Systray Support

Ok I created some new patches. (I decided to break it up this time. They can be applied in any order) Thanks for helping test this! :) If you have any feedback, please let me know...If they work out OK I will post them to wine-patches again. James On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 11:07 +0530, Vijay Kiran Ka

Re: Wine API Documentation

On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:38:19 +0100, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We don't really want the WineHQ web server to be running at 100% CPU for ~20 minutes while it builds the API documentation. couldn't it just be niced down to a low priority ? Even if it took a day to compile.