Re: comctl32/tests/updown failures on xp?

2007-01-18 Thread Dan Kegel
On 1/18/07, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... running [comctl32's updown test in windows] found two failures: updown.c:509: Test failed: create parent window: the msg 0x0281 was expected, but got msg 0x0007 instead updown.c:522: Test failed: add updown control with edit: in msg 0x0005 exp

comctl32/tests/updown failures on xp?

2007-01-18 Thread Dan Kegel
While getting ready for cs130 (thanks to Lei and James for all the help), I tried building and running comctl32/tests/updown.c standalone on winxp using Visual C++ Express 2005 (the freely downloadable one) and the Platform SDK (also freely downloadable, needed for e.g. user32.lib and .h files).

re: regression from 0.9.28 -> 0.9.29 breaks U.S. tax program

2007-01-18 Thread Dan Kegel
On 1/18/07, Tom Lowe wrote: Using ubuntu 6.10 and wine packages from http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/apt edgy main TaxACT 2006 ( free download from http://www.taxact.com ) works "out-of-the-box" with 0.9.28. Checking for program updates and electronic filing "hang" with 0.9.29. When 0.9.29 hu

Re: user32/tests: Mysterious WinXP 0xae and 0xef messages.

2007-01-18 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Kirill K. Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: While improving rejected tests for WM_SETICON: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-January/034949.html I've noticed, that WinXP sends some mysterious message 0xae, that breaks tests. Googling it, I've found few notes indicating to W

Re: regression from 0.9.28 -> 0.9.29 breaks U.S. tax program

2007-01-18 Thread Lei Zhang
Hi Tom, Can you file a bug on Wine's bugzilla? http://bugs.winehq.org/ Thanks! - Lei On 1/18/07, Tom Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Using ubuntu 6.10 and wine packages from http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/apt edgy main TaxACT 2006 ( free download from http://www.taxact.com ) works "out-of-th

user32/tests: Mysterious WinXP 0xae and 0xef messages.

2007-01-18 Thread Kirill K. Smirnov
Hi! While improving rejected tests for WM_SETICON: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-January/034949.html I've noticed, that WinXP sends some mysterious message 0xae, that breaks tests. Googling it, I've found few notes indicating to WM_NCUAHDRAWCAPTION [0xae] message and WM_NCU

regression from 0.9.28 -> 0.9.29 breaks U.S. tax program

2007-01-18 Thread Tom Lowe
Using ubuntu 6.10 and wine packages from http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/apt edgy main TaxACT 2006 ( free download from http://www.taxact.com ) works "out-of-the-box" with 0.9.28. Checking for program updates and electronic filing "hang" with 0.9.29. When 0.9.29 hung up on me, I removed it and r

Re: iphlpapi - MacOS / BSD support

2007-01-18 Thread Gavriel State
Hi Juan, Cool - in that case, our patch for iphlpapi should be considered dual licensed under both the LGPL and MIT/X11 license. Take care,  -Gav Juan Lang wrote: As the iphlpapi DLL is LGPLed, our patches to it are necessarily under the LGPL as well. In fact that's not t

Re: Greenville Revisited, A new look at FontForge

2007-01-18 Thread Steven Edwards
On 1/18/07, Wierd_w <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Feedback would be greatly appreciated. I'll take another stab at doing a mingw build of fontforge if that would help. Could you send along you latest build of Greenville so I could play with it a bit more? -- Steven Edwards "There is one thing st

Re: File buffering

2007-01-18 Thread Robert Shearman
Teemu Ikonen wrote: On 1/18/07, Damjan Jovanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/17/07, Teemu Ikonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you don't wait for the forked process to finish before deleting the file, then you have a bug called a race condition which apparently manifests in wine and not in W

Re: File buffering

2007-01-18 Thread Teemu Ikonen
On 1/18/07, Damjan Jovanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/17/07, Teemu Ikonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you don't wait for the forked process to finish before deleting the file, then you have a bug called a race condition which apparently manifests in wine and not in Windows: you're relyin

[1/4] D3D9: Implement IDirect3DDevice9::StretchRect

2007-01-18 Thread Christoph Bumiller
This also (partially) fixes the issue with NFS:MW where nothing except the menus appears to be draw when setting the Visual Treatment option to high. The scene is now visible, but its scaled down in the y direction and only covers about the top 2/3 of the screen ...

Greenville Revisited, A new look at FontForge

2007-01-18 Thread Wierd_w
OK, Due to the recent interest in Greenville, and the fact that enough time has passed that my original rage/disgust/contempt at freetype has faded, I decided to grab a recent Cygwin port of FontForge, and take a spin. FontForge is able to import the compiled glyphsets I produce with Fontlab(the e

Re: [2/2] shell32: Add proper support for SHGetFileInfo(SHGFI_ICONLOCATION | SHGFI_USEFILEATTRIBUTES).

2007-01-18 Thread Frank Richter
On 18.01.2007 16:23, Francois Gouget wrote: > +if (dwFileAttributes & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_DIRECTORY) > +{ > +lstrcpyW(psfi->szDisplayName, swShell32Name); > +psfi->iIcon = -IDI_SHELL_FOLDER; > +} At least on Windows, folders have a fil

Re: wined3d: Synchronize window style correcting code with ddraw

2007-01-18 Thread H. Verbeet
On 18/01/07, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, this patch should fix the regression reported on #wine-hackers. Changelog: wined3d: Synchronize window style correcting code with ddraw. Although afaik there's nothing wrong with this patch, I do have a patch myself that move

Re: [PATCH 1/4] ntdll: Implement RtlEncode/DecodePointer

2007-01-18 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Mike McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/loader.c b/dlls/ntdll/loader.c > index 999687a..468e5b6 100644 > --- a/dlls/ntdll/loader.c > +++ b/dlls/ntdll/loader.c > @@ -2161,6 +2161,7 @@ void WINAPI LdrInitializeThunk( ULONG unknown1, ULONG > unknown2, ULONG unknown3, >

Re: [Wine] www.winehq.com newsletter dead forever?

2007-01-18 Thread Kai Blin
On Thursday 18 January 2007 08:26, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > On 1/18/07, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I said this before (in IRC, I guess), but I think that WWN could be done > > with a load balancing scheme. Round robin seems to be fine for that. So, > > let's say we get 4 people to do