Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2008 8:30 PM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On my machine, we've been hovering between
>>> five and ten test suite failures for some time
>>> (see http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916 )
>>> ...
>>> How 'bout folks spend some time tracking
>>> t
On Jan 13, 2008 8:30 PM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On my machine, we've been hovering between
> > five and ten test suite failures for some time
> > (see http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916 )
> > ...
> > How 'bout folks spend some time tracking
> > the current six odd
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Please add this component to bugzilla:
> winmm - windows multimedia (old sound, midi)
>
>
> Don't think there are any need to split Wine sound drivers into their
> separate components... yet.
>
> Vitaliy.
>
>
One more to the list:
ntoskrnl - WinNT kernel emulation l
Please add this component to bugzilla:
winmm - windows multimedia (old sound, midi)
Don't think there are any need to split Wine sound drivers into their
separate components... yet.
Vitaliy.
On Jan 13, 2008 6:53 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On my machine, we've been hovering between
> five and ten test suite failures for some time
> (see http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916 )
>
> IMHO one of the hallmarks of 1.0 should be reliably
> getting zero test suite failures
On Jan 13, 2008 9:19 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "James Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > These are the counts of the remaining obsolete components:
> >
> > binary - 1193
> > directx - 375
> > files - 137
> > gui - 358
> > multimedia - 139
> > winelib - 143
> >
> > I'l
"James Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These are the counts of the remaining obsolete components:
>
> binary - 1193
> directx - 375
> files - 137
> gui - 358
> multimedia - 139
> winelib - 143
>
> I'll correct these components at a rate of about 100 a day so as not
> to spam the list too m
Robert Shearman wrote:
> James McKenzie wrote:
>
>> Because git is unstable on the Mac platform, I've been utilizing a
>> little time investigating the use of either SVN or CVS to download .git
>> updates. This appears to not be working per the Wiki pages for SVN.
>>
>>
>
> I've been
L. Rahyen wrote:
> On Sunday January 13 2008 20:45:49 Steven Edwards wrote:
>
>> Because we
>> obviously don't care about whats convenient to people coming from a
>> windows background using that logic.
>>
>
> "We shouldn't care about Windows power users" != "we shouldn't care
> abou
On my machine, we've been hovering between
five and ten test suite failures for some time
(see http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916 )
IMHO one of the hallmarks of 1.0 should be reliably
getting zero test suite failures.
That would make regressions stand out like sore thumbs
instead of requi
On Sunday January 13 2008 20:45:49 Steven Edwards wrote:
> My point in reply to Dmitry's comment was while I
> agree using winecfg for msconfig functionality is fine I was just
> using a reductio ad-absurdum to point out that if we are not going to
> make a wrapper program for msconfig for power wi
On Jan 13, 2008 8:39 AM, L. Rahyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you disagree with WINE policy related to ReactOS you need to talk
> to AJ
> directly (for example, on IRC channel). Multiple requests to exclude existing
> tools on wine-devel without good reasons will not help to make WIN
James McKenzie wrote:
> Because git is unstable on the Mac platform, I've been utilizing a
> little time investigating the use of either SVN or CVS to download .git
> updates. This appears to not be working per the Wiki pages for SVN.
>
I've been using git releases on my Mac for the last yea
> There are quite a few installers that use RunOnce to get around file
> locking, but I still haven't had to use one fortunately. As I said, as
> long as I can disable it. RunOnce wouldn't even have to be disabled,
> I'd be happy with a "RunOnce wants to execute 'foo.exe blipp blopp',
> 'No, and cl
On Jan 13, 2008 7:49 AM, Jan Zerebecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because it was asked:
>
> We have to move all (including closed) bugs from a component into
> others to remove that component. If an component is not empty
> when it's removed all it's bugs also get removed.
>
> But there is also t
Still fails:
patching file programs/wineboot/wineboot.rc
patching file programs/wineboot/wineboot_Ru.rc
patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
patch: malformed patch at line 46:
patch version is 2.5.4
Do you succeed applying this patch on your system?
I noticed that there is no 'newli
Microsoft pulled the download I'd been using for mfc40
some time ago, but Hans Leidekker found a replacement.
Thanks, Hans!
New winetricks at the usual place,
http://kegel.com/wine/winetricks
On Jan 13, 2008 8:41 AM, Jan Zerebecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:42:19AM -0700, James Hawkins wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2008 9:55 AM, Jan Zerebecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Changes which IMHO should not be done:
> > > wine-help -> hhctrl - Help viewer implementation
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:42:19AM -0700, James Hawkins wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 9:55 AM, Jan Zerebecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Changes which IMHO should not be done:
> > wine-help -> hhctrl - Help viewer implementation
> > help is currently not for the various help APIs but for user
> >
Because it was asked:
We have to move all (including closed) bugs from a component into
others to remove that component. If an component is not empty
when it's removed all it's bugs also get removed.
But there is also the possibility to just leave obsolete
components around forever.
Jan
On Sunday January 13 2008 12:52:22 Steven Edwards wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2008 6:24 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My impression was that Wine follows the requests and demands of Linux
> > (and other supported OSes) users, not the Windows' ones regardless of
> > their powerfulness.
On Sunday 13 January 2008 06:19:06 Forrest Samuels wrote:
> Does anyone have any insight on where I should start looking to
> implement this? Implementation suggestions? In the bug, Juan Lang made
> the suggestion that "Explorer's hal.c should be extended to create new
> devices for all the ports
On 1/13/08, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Peter Bortas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > And a flag to turn off this behaviour. So far I've never had a setup
> > where I'd want the Run/RunOnce entries to execute.
>
> For instance Microsoft Office finishes its setup process when bei
On Jan 13, 2008 6:24 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My impression was that Wine follows the requests and demands of Linux
> (and other supported OSes) users, not the Windows' ones regardless of
> their powerfulness.
Well most Windows power users are used to a graphical registry
"James McKenzie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is CVS or SVN still being supported for Wine or is git the only
> supported download (I don't expect to do any patching for now) method
> for .git updates?
http://www.winehq.org/site/cvs
--
Dmitry.
Because git is unstable on the Mac platform, I've been utilizing a
little time investigating the use of either SVN or CVS to download .git
updates. This appears to not be working per the Wiki pages for SVN.
Is CVS or SVN still being supported for Wine or is git the only
supported download (I
> OK, new winetricks up, with new packages
> vcrun2005sp1
> vcrun2008
> xvid
> ffdshow
> and new pseudopackages
> allfonts
> allvcodecs
> It no longer picks a particular sourceforge mirror, which
> should help folks who don't live near Los Angeles.
> And mono12 is updated to mono-1.2.6
"Peter Bortas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And a flag to turn off this behaviour. So far I've never had a setup
> where I'd want the Run/RunOnce entries to execute.
For instance Microsoft Office finishes its setup process when being run
from the RunOnce key after reboot.
--
Dmitry.
"Steven Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is true. I am just saying most windows power uses expect msconfig
> to be there these days. We could have a dummy msconfig thats just a
> wrapper and invokes winecfg on the correct page. Being as we don't
> follow the design windows power users ex
On 1/11/08, Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:36:04PM +0100, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > This is release 0.9.53 of Wine, a free implementation of Windows on Unix.
> >
> > What's new in this release:
> > - RunOnce and Run entries now executed on startup.
>
>
On Jan 13, 2008 4:18 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't see why winecfg can't have a page similar to what msconfig has.
> It not hard to add it to winecfg, there is nothing magic in the reactos
> version.
This is true. I am just saying most windows power uses expect msconfig
"Steven Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Winecfg is not really the place for it. Windows power users expect to
> have msconfigits a shame we can't lift the one from ReactOS
> because they have a working LGPL replacement.
I don't see why winecfg can't have a page similar to what msconfig
32 matches
Mail list logo
