Dan Kegel wrote: > On Jan 13, 2008 8:30 PM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On my machine, we've been hovering between >>> five and ten test suite failures for some time >>> (see http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916 ) >>> ... >>> How 'bout folks spend some time tracking >>> the current six odd failures down and cleaning them up? >> Sounds like a worthy goal IMO. It seems theres much more than 5 or 6 >> things which need work though: >> http://test.winehq.org/data/200801121000/ > > Not a pretty picture, is it? > But I was only referring to the tests that fail on Wine; there, > we have control over both the test and the code, so if > we can't get those tests passing, we're pretty weak :-)
Are these tests passing (now) on Alexandre's machine? I thought he didn't apply patches that break the wine tests? (at least on his box). > >> Perhaps we should try and >> have the nightly suite also pass all tests -- or is this too much of a >> frivolous goal? > > Getting all tests passing on Windows XP would be great, > but it's a lot of work. It'd be less work if we focused on just the tests > that are failing on *all* Win XP systems, but that's still Why XP? Doesn't that mean our default should be XP as well? > at least 180 ok's that aren't ok. Let's at least fix the 5 or 10 that are > failing on Wine, and try to keep them fixed. > - Dan > > > -- Cheers, Paul.