Hi Juan,
On Friday 25 July 2008 16:49:34 Juan Lang wrote:
[...]
Please, either tell me I'm wrong, or make Wine honest about what it's
telling the user.
No, you're not wrong, and this email was my attempt at being honest.
... and your honesty is appreciated!
I'll point out that there are
Security often involves providing many barriers. There's a tacit assumption
that none are going to be perfect. A common mantra is security in depth.
Sure. It's just my professional opinion that a signature on an
application provides no security. Zip, nada. It does give you some
assurance
H. Verbeet wrote:
2008/7/25 Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW this is a driver crash in libglcore.so with what appears to be a
null-pointer dereference. I'm trying to play with your code to see how to
fix it.
Thanks.
Ok I think I see the problem:
Hi, and sorry for missing this mail and responding late,
My project to implement PrintDlgEx() has been going well in that I've
implemented everything but the custom property pages feature (and ANSI
support). Therefore, at this point, my main challenge is to implement
this feature and to ensure
2008/7/25 Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok I think I see the problem:
0045:trace:d3d_surface:surface_load_ds_location before bind_fbo
0045:trace:d3d:bind_fbo 0x14f474 - 0
0045:trace:d3d:bind_fbo glGenFramebuffersEXT() - 2 @
../../../wine.git/dlls/wined3d/device.c:6084 call ok
Hi,
Paul Millar wrote:
As an aside: this looks to me like a logical fallacy. If I may rephrase your
argument:
1. Most signed software is from a large code-base (probably true)
2. Large code-bases are more likely to have vulnerabilities (probably true)
3. Therefore, signed software is
Hi, im from Germany and i would use iTunes with the iPod Touch. I saw a
Post on the Mailing list that its possible to Sync the Touch over iTunes
using wine, but its not implemented yet.
Is it possible to get the Patches? Im suck of using iTunes in a VM with
Windows on my System. So i would like
Maybe that's an already asked question, but why does wine reset path
on each wine update ? That's becoming annoying... I mus reedit registry
on each update to make my apps work again.
Ciao
Max
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Mathias Karwath
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, im from Germany and i would use iTunes with the iPod Touch. I saw a
Post on the Mailing list that its possible to Sync the Touch over iTunes
using wine, but its not implemented yet.
Is it possible to get the
Austin English wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Mathias Karwath
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, im from Germany and i would use iTunes with the iPod Touch. I saw a
Post on the Mailing list that its possible to Sync the Touch over iTunes
using wine, but its not implemented yet.
Is it
Massimo Del Fedele wrote:
Maybe that's an already asked question, but why does wine reset path
on each wine update ? That's becoming annoying... I mus reedit registry
on each update to make my apps work again.
Which path are you talking about? Please open a bug.
Vitaliy
THE 'path', the one set in window's environment, the one windows uses to
look for executables.
Upon wine update, when wineprefix gets updated the path is reset to
default one (IIRC c:\\windows;c:\\windows\\system32)
I didn't open a bug because I don't know if it's a bug or a required
Max wrote:
Vitaliy Margolen ha scritto:
Massimo Del Fedele wrote:
Maybe that's an already asked question, but why does wine reset
path on each wine update ? That's becoming annoying... I mus reedit
registry on each update to make my apps work again.
Which path are you talking about?
Vitaliy Margolen ha scritto:
Max wrote:
Vitaliy Margolen ha scritto:
Massimo Del Fedele wrote:
Maybe that's an already asked question, but why does wine reset
path on each wine update ? That's becoming annoying... I mus reedit
registry on each update to make my apps work again.
Which
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 1:48 AM, H. Verbeet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/7/25 Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So it seems the FBOs are created in one thread used there, then
rebounding in the new thread leads to the crash.
Any ideas how to fix this? Or what to try?
AFAIK that's
Allan Tong wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 1:48 AM, H. Verbeet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/7/25 Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So it seems the FBOs are created in one thread used there, then
rebounding in the new thread leads to the crash.
Any ideas how to fix this? Or what to try?
2008/7/26 Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So if we need to create an fbo for each thread, does that mean that
everything needs to be rebound to it on the context switch?
It would mostly mean that apply_fbo_state() would need to track things
per-context rather than per-device. I guess that
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 3:39 PM, H. Verbeet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/7/26 Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So if we need to create an fbo for each thread, does that mean that
everything needs to be rebound to it on the context switch?
It would mostly mean that apply_fbo_state() would
2008/7/26 Allan Tong [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You could try the attached hack patch to see if it fixes the problem
you're seeing. It completely ignores FBO cleanup, but it should avoid
the driver bug.
It's not *that* easy. You'll need to adjust the code in
apply_fbo_state() as well.
Attached to this note is a patch I have been working on for the past
few days to finish out the above function.
What I did was use MSDN for the definition :
/*
* Get / Set Render States
* TODO: Verify against dx9 definitions
*
Direct X 9 Definition:
Parameters
State
[in] Device
John Klehm wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Chris Ahrendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached to this note is a patch I have been working on for the past few
days to finish out the above function.
What I did was use MSDN for the definition :
Copyright issues ensue when you copy and
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 5:34 PM, H. Verbeet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/7/26 Allan Tong [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You could try the attached hack patch to see if it fixes the problem
you're seeing. It completely ignores FBO cleanup, but it should avoid
the driver bug.
It's not *that* easy.
22 matches
Mail list logo
