Vladimir Pankratov wrote:
static void TaskManager_OnMenuSelect(HWND hWnd, UINT nItemID, UINT nFlags,
HMENU hSysMenu)
{
-TCHAR str[100];
+WCHAR wstr[256];
+WCHAR wszEmptyStr[] = {' ',0};
-_tcscpy(str, TEXT());
-if (LoadString(hInst, nItemID, str, 100)) {
-
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Zachary Goldberg zgold550 at gmail.com wrote:
Your patch is more likely to be accepted if it comes with a test which
works on windows, didnt pass in wine before but passes now and
demonstrates why the new behavior is correct.
There is no need for a test since that's
On Do, 2008-08-07 at 15:45 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch modifies the Makefile.in file to include some new file to be
compile
- You must use your real name
- Wine must compile after every Patch.
You need to add the changes for Makefile.in, when you add a file
- Why do you need
So is there anything I should do now? Or just wait to see what happens?
Wait, as Alexandre's on vacation until the 18th. He'll probably
commit this after he gets back, but if you notice a bunch of things
getting committed and yours did not and did not get any feedback from
him, you can ask
On Fr, 2008-08-08 at 16:51 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Investigate the RelayInclude and RelayExclude string values in
[HKCU\Software\Wine\Debug] if you're being overwhelmed by certain
functions. [...]
I suppose this is a registry entry, right?
Yes. HKCU (or HCU) is:
On Fr, 2008-08-01 at 12:56 +0100, Huw Davies wrote:
Hi folks,
Here's an update on the DIB engine that I've been working on for the
last few months. This work has been made possible by the generosity
of Google - so thanks go to them and of course to Dan.
You can find the code at
Hi James,
Title states it all. I would like to compile tests to run against WindowsXP
to see if the test will function. Could I un'to-do' this test and compile it
with MinGW?
todo_wine tests are always run, whether or not the todo_wine flag is
there. The only difference is how the
Juan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Aug 9, 2008 6:41 PM wrote about Question: Why
are EM_FORMATRANGE Tests 'To Do' in reply to James McKenzie's question on this
subject.
Hi James,
Title states it all. I would like to compile tests to run against WindowsXP
to see if the test will function.
Detlef Riekenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -848,6 +848,10 @@ RPC_STATUS WINAPI I_RpcBindingInqTransportType(
RPC_BINDING_HANDLE Binding, unsi
{
FIXME( (%p,%p): stub\n, Binding, Type);
+
+ /* NT: RPC_S_NO_CONTEXT_AVAILABLE, 9x: RPC_S_NO_CALL_ACTIVE */
+ if (!Binding) return
Thank you for the clarification. Thus, I can run the pre-built executable on
WindowsXP and there should be no richedit errors, correct?
That's the theory :) The test don't run without error on my XP system, so YMMV.
--Juan
Juan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Aug 9, 2008 8:27 PM (PNT) wrote additionally
in reply to Question: Why are EM_FORMATRANGE Tests 'To Do'
Thank you for the clarification. Thus, I can run the pre-built executable
on WindowsXP and there should be no richedit errors, correct?
That's the theory :)
Then I should end up with errors on my WindowsXP system that match yours. I
don't have time tonight to do so, but my find time tomorrow to run them.
Oops, I realized I should have been more clear. I mean the tests in
general fail on my XP system. I just ran the riched20 tests, though,
so
For the moment, the results only go to a web page,
http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results/
Most of the results there right now are just test messages
so you can see how it will look when real patches
with various problems are received.
The scripts are a bit ugly, so expect problems to
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the moment, the results only go to a web page,
http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results/
Most of the results there right now are just test messages
so you can see how it will look when real patches
with various problems
14 matches
Mail list logo
