On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:45:52 -0700
Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new machine has a fairly modern nvidia card, so
more of the tests are actually run.
Where can I find the spec of the new machine ?
Are you using the closed source driver ?
I want to see the full system spec hardware and
Chris Robinson a écrit :
On Thursday 30 October 2008 03:46:51 am Darragh Bailey wrote:
Just out of curiousity, have any of these limitations been raised with the
OpenAL developers? Any of them in its future wish list?
I'm the developer of OpenAL Soft
Henri Verbeet a écrit :
Actually, I just cleaned up your patches, and will probably submit the
first few later today.
Are you going to finish it or can I send the few missing functions ?
Henri Verbeet a écrit :
2008/10/31 Jérôme Gardou [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Henri Verbeet a écrit :
Actually, I just cleaned up your patches, and will probably submit the
first few later today.
Are you going to finish it or can I send the few missing functions ?
Sure, go
Henri Verbeet a écrit :
2008/10/31 Jérôme Gardou [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK, patches will be sent soon. By the way, what if I call multiply on a new
stack, the push, then pop ? Will the top matrix be identity, or the one with
which I multiplied the first time ?
I guess this calls a testcase ...
Jérôme Gardou a écrit :
Henri Verbeet a écrit :
2008/10/31 Jérôme Gardou [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK, patches will be sent soon. By the way, what if I call multiply
on a new
stack, the push, then pop ? Will the top matrix be identity, or the
one with
which I multiplied the first time ?
I
Hi,
There is a discussion going on over at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/111061 about
improving Wine's look and feel to better match the system that it is
running on.
The situation is as follows:
== Colour Schemes
Wine supports these by reading the settings from the
I can't read your mind or guess what those some extra bits are. Why can't
you mark the failing tests with todo_wine and think later how to make the
tests pass?
This function must set only supported codepages bits
The supported codepages are:
Vitaly Perov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This function must set only supported codepages bits
The supported codepages are:
ttp://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/reference/WinCP.mspx
Again, it absolutely doesn't really matter what code pages Windows supports,
or MSDN declares as supported, the only
Hi,
There are a bunch of uxtheme / control theming bugs which need to be fixed but
lets ignore those issues for now.
In the end we need to support a bunch of different theme engines GTK, QT, Cocoa
and perhaps later on more. In theory it would be possible to create a different
uxtheme backend
On 01.11.2008 14:04, Reece Dunn wrote:
Note that as Vista has a different msstyles theming engine (it is a
DLL),
It's also a DLL on XP. Note that in both cases no code is exported, the
DLLs serve only as a container for the theme data, stored as resources.
we could have the msstyles DLL
2008/11/1 Roderick Colenbrander [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In the end we need to support a bunch of different theme engines GTK, QT,
Cocoa and perhaps later on more. In theory it would be possible to create a
different uxtheme backend for each different toolkit. One major issue is the
language
IMHO WINE developers should first focus on applications, not their look.
I believe most users would like to see Visual Studio running in gray
instead of not running as native.
Dnia 2008-11-01, sob o godzinie 14:58 +, Reece Dunn pisze:
2008/11/1 Roderick Colenbrander [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In
2008/11/1 Frank Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 01.11.2008 14:04, Reece Dunn wrote:
we could have the msstyles DLL expose the uxtheme API and have
uxtheme call msstyles to do the rendering. That way, we could have a
gtk.msstyles, qt3.msstyles, qt4.msstyles and an carbon.msstyles
That sounds
On 01.11.2008 16:06, Reece Dunn wrote:
It would also be a good idea to look at the capabilities of the major
theming engines (Gtk, Qt, Cocoa) and possibly some others like the one
used by Enlightemnent and try to abstract an API that can accommodate
them all in a straightforward way.
2008/11/1 Tomasz Sałaciński [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
IMHO WINE developers should first focus on applications, not their look.
I believe most users would like to see Visual Studio running in gray
instead of not running as native.
Application functionality is important. Applications should run as
well
My whole point is maintenance and distribution. Sure you could create different
plugins for uxtheme but the language limitation won't allow such plugins to
enter Wine. They would need to be maintained outside of Wine which would be
bad. It has risks of bitrotting and second it would be a pain
2008/11/1 Roderick Colenbrander [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My whole point is maintenance and distribution. Sure you could create
different plugins for uxtheme but the language limitation won't allow such
plugins to enter Wine. They would need to be maintained outside of Wine which
would be bad. It
A tool which creates a .msstyles theme basically does the same as a uxtheme
engine would do. A uxtheme engine plugin would use gtk/qt/cocoa to load colors,
bitmaps and so on in a representation needed by uxtheme. The winetheme app
would do the same but also have a way to write this data back
On 01.11.2008 16:49, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
The winetheme app would have plugins
So winetheme would have plugins - that seems to make the whole thing an
additional complication over straight uxtheme plugins, since you have
the application as an extra layer in the middle. And as already
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Luke Bratch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anybody opposed to me setting up an auto-responder so that any mail going
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets auto responded to with a message to post in
Bugzilla instead?
What about setting the reply-to header on the emails from
If you have a windows license, you can use a native d3dx8.dll to check your
test. That is I do ;)
And as said henri said, the result matix will be the previous. I had a test to
prove it
David
--- En date de : Sam 1.11.08, Jérôme Gardou [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
De: Jérôme Gardou [EMAIL
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Matt Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Luke Bratch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anybody opposed to me setting up an auto-responder so that any mail going
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets auto responded to with a message to post in
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Austin English [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Matt Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about setting the reply-to header on the emails from bugzilla to
a more appropriate address?
Such as?
wine-devel seems like a good candidate.
--- On Sat, 1/11/08, Matt Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wine-devel seems like a good candidate. What is the nature of the
emails that people are sending back to wine-bugs when they are
responding? Does it look like they are trying to add comments for the
bug?
Yes it's people trying to add
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Frank Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So winetheme would have plugins - that seems to make the whole thing an
additional complication over straight uxtheme plugins, since you have
the application as an extra layer in the middle. And as already said, an
2008/11/1 Steven Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Frank Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So winetheme would have plugins - that seems to make the whole thing an
additional complication over straight uxtheme plugins, since you have
the application as an extra layer in
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Matt Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Austin English [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Matt Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about setting the reply-to header on the emails from bugzilla to
a more
I'm taking the patchwatcher machines down to upgrade them
to Intrepid Ibex this weekend.
Incidentally, a jaguar plowed through the corner of
our garage here at home. For a short while it
was a 2.1 car garage :-) I may be somewhat
distracted until that's dealt with somehow.
- Dan
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Reece Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wine can create an infrastructure to support bindings to different
toolkits. Due to the nature of some of those toolkits, some of the
bindings will have to live outside the Wine tree. So in that respect,
the problem can be
30 matches
Mail list logo
