Re: Anyone at LinuxTag?

2009-06-27 Thread Kai Blin
On Saturday 27 June 2009 02:16:42 Dan Kegel wrote: If anyone's at LinuxTag, maybe it would be worth wandering over to Halle 7.2a, Stand 111 and chat the projects up to see if any of them have any interest in Wine... Ah, damn, that was like a day late. I won't make it in time today. However,

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-27 Thread Gert van den Berg
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 02:32, Dan Kegeld...@kegel.com wrote: (What's missing is the ability to add howto's and notes at the application level, i.e. one level higher than the version level where they all go right now, but that's not usually a dealbreaker.) The usefulness of app-level howo's

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-27 Thread Ben Klein
2009/6/27 Gert van den Berg wine-de...@mohag.net: On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 02:32, Dan Kegeld...@kegel.com wrote: (What's missing is the ability to add howto's and notes at the application level, i.e. one level higher than the version level where they all go right now, but that's not usually a

Fixing EOL in logging messages

2009-06-27 Thread Frédéric Delanoy
Hi, I'm intending to fix some non-\n-terminated strings for different logging classes (MESSAGE, TRACE, ...) For each class, should I send (1) a patch for *each* affected module or (2) just a generic one ? Solution (1) seems a bit like overkill for me... Frédéric

re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-27 Thread Susan Cragin
A basic level of courtesy shouldn't be too hard. Dogfights where two maintainers are asking to have each other thrown out are a good sign that both of said developers need to chill. We need more women. Susan

Re: Fixing EOL in logging messages

2009-06-27 Thread Ricardo Filipe
2009/6/27 Frédéric Delanoy frederic.dela...@gmail.com Hi, I'm intending to fix some non-\n-terminated strings for different logging classes (MESSAGE, TRACE, ...) For each class, should I send (1) a patch for *each* affected module or (2) just a generic one ? Solution (1) seems a bit like

Re: Removing active maintainers

2009-06-27 Thread Remco
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Susan Craginsusancra...@earthlink.net wrote: A basic level of courtesy shouldn't be too hard. Dogfights where two maintainers are asking to have each other thrown out are a good sign that both of said developers need to chill. We need more women. Susan Recruit

Re: [4/6] WineD3D: Implement function calls with NV exts

2009-06-27 Thread Henri Verbeet
2009/6/27 Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com: -|| ins.handler_idx == WINED3DSIH_PHASE -|| ins.handler_idx == WINED3DSIH_RET) +|| ins.handler_idx == WINED3DSIH_PHASE) Did you test this change with GLSL?

Re: [4/6] WineD3D: Implement function calls with NV exts

2009-06-27 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Saturday 27 June 2009 22:19:27 schrieb Henri Verbeet: 2009/6/27 Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com: -|| ins.handler_idx == WINED3DSIH_PHASE -|| ins.handler_idx == WINED3DSIH_RET) +|| ins.handler_idx == WINED3DSIH_PHASE) Did you test

Re: [4/6] WineD3D: Implement function calls with NV exts

2009-06-27 Thread Henri Verbeet
2009/6/27 Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com: Am Saturday 27 June 2009 22:19:27 schrieb Henri Verbeet: 2009/6/27 Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com: -                || ins.handler_idx == WINED3DSIH_PHASE -                || ins.handler_idx == WINED3DSIH_RET) +                ||

Re: [5/6] WineD3D: Write the vshader footer in a separate function

2009-06-27 Thread Ivan Gyurdiev
Re: [5/6] WineD3D: Write the vshader footer in a separate function I like this patch - would be great to have more of these: Lines that fit on the screen in my gnome-terminal: 50 Average size of six large ARB shader functions, before this patch: 205 (generate