On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
> Justin Chevrier wrote:
>> ---
>> dlls/gdiplus/tests/graphics.c | 22 +++---
>> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> You're still not getting it!
>
> Remember, when each patch is applied, all the tests must p
Justin Chevrier wrote:
> ---
> dlls/gdiplus/tests/graphics.c | 22 +++---
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
You're still not getting it!
Remember, when each patch is applied, all the tests must pass. That's
the rule. If the second patch is applied without this
> Do I need that for the 1,4 and 8bpp tests? With my patch to
> GdipGetNearestColor these tests pass and behave like Windows 7. I did
> forget a todo_wine on the 16bpp grayscale test though...
The tests should pass independently after each patch in the series is
applied. The todo_wine's are in cas
Do I need that for the 1,4 and 8bpp tests? With my patch to
GdipGetNearestColor these tests pass and behave like Windows 7. I did
forget a todo_wine on the 16bpp grayscale test though...
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Vincent Povirk
wrote:
>> + status = GdipGetNearestColor(graphics, &col
> + status = GdipGetNearestColor(graphics, &color);
> + expect(Ok, status);
I think you still need to mark this as todo_wine.
-Forwarded Message-
>From: James Mckenzie
>Sent: Feb 25, 2010 6:52 AM
>To: Charles Davis
>Subject: Re: Unable to Compile Wine on MacOSX
>
>>James McKenzie wrote:
>>> Interestingly enough, I have run into the 'Unable to compile' problem
>>> building the latest git on MacOSX. Maybe ther
Hi Paul,
On 2/25/10 11:43 AM, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi Jacek,
On 02/24/2010 09:30 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 2/24/10 8:59 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
We seem to have 2 different approaches for dll registration:
1) a regsvr.c file with all the necessary functions and registry
informatio
Mikołaj Zalewski writes:
> @@ -33,6 +33,30 @@
>
> #include "shell32_test.h"
>
> +#define expect_eq_x(expected, actual) \
> +do { \
> + int value = (actual); \
> + ok((expected) == value, "Expected " #actual " to be 0x%x (" #expected
> ") is 0x%x\n", \
> + (expected),
On Thursday 25 February 2010 12:12:41 Jan Gerrit Möltgen wrote:
Hi Jan,
> I'm not sure, if this is the right place for my question, but I thought
> it's better than the user-list. The LinuxTag in Berlin makes a call for
> projects ( http://wiki.linuxtag.org/w/fp:Call_for_Projects ) and in my
> op
Charles Davis wrote:
>I have noticed a change in configure behavior, though.
Me too. On MacOS.
Since 1.1.39, Makefiles are created at the rate of ~ 1 per sec.
It was much faster in 1.1.38 and before, I estimate ~6 files per second.
Anyone to confirm this?
>I always do git fetch; git rebase ori
Hello together,
I'm not sure, if this is the right place for my question, but I thought it's
better than the user-list. The LinuxTag in Berlin makes a call for projects (
http://wiki.linuxtag.org/w/fp:Call_for_Projects ) and in my oppinion Wine
should be represented there. Has somebody already
Hi Jacek,
On 02/24/2010 09:30 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 2/24/10 8:59 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
We seem to have 2 different approaches for dll registration:
1) a regsvr.c file with all the necessary functions and registry
information.
2) an inf file and some code to register/unregis
On 02/25/2010 08:35 AM, John Chow wrote:
This patch adds the test case for bug 18346: cmd does not support the
"^" escape character (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18346).
The test fails on Wine but passes on WineTestBot.
-John Chow
You forgot the patch (and also in the second mail)
13 matches
Mail list logo
