Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4576
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4577
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4578
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4581
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4574
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4590
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4591
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4592
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4593
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4594
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4595
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4597
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4596
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4589
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4582
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4588
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4599
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4604
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4602
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4600
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4603
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4601
Your paranoid
I've tried for some time to specify the wine-devel Reply-To using
git-send-email, with little success so far
Any idea how this might be done?
Here's how my git config looks like:
[sendemail]
smtp server config
from = user email
to = wine-patches wine-patc...@winehq.org
assume8bitEncoding = UTF-8
On 08/21/2010 09:34 AM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
Here's how my git config looks like:
[sendemail]
smtp server config
from = useremail
to = wine-patcheswine-patc...@winehq.org
assume8bitEncoding = UTF-8
suppresscc = self
chainreplyto = false
thread = false
suppressfrom = true
From
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4624
Your paranoid
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 8/20/2010 20:04, Marko Nikolic wrote:
Changed variable type to match function return type.
---
dlls/appwiz.cpl/appwiz.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/appwiz.cpl/appwiz.c b/dlls/appwiz.cpl/appwiz.c
index
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Matteo Bruni wrote:
Hmm, so srcidx is unused. Yes, that piece of code is useless now, it's
a remnant of an older version of that function where the source
register was handled by some ad-hoc code, which I since then replaced
with a call to the generic This-funcs-srcreg().
On 8/21/2010 12:18, Marko Nikolic wrote:
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 8/20/2010 20:04, Marko Nikolic wrote:
Changed variable type to match function return type.
---
dlls/appwiz.cpl/appwiz.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/appwiz.cpl/appwiz.c
2010/8/21 GOUJON Alexandre ale.gou...@gmail.com:
On 08/21/2010 09:34 AM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
Here's how my git config looks like:
[sendemail]
smtp server config
from = useremail
to = wine-patcheswine-patc...@winehq.org
assume8bitEncoding = UTF-8
suppresscc = self
chainreplyto =
2010/8/21 GOUJON Alexandre ale.gou...@gmail.com:
[format]
headers = To: wine-patches wine-patc...@winehq.org\nReply-To:
wine-devel wine-devel@winehq.org\n
As the name of the section suggests, this adds header lines to files
generated with `git format-patch'. If you then send those files
On 08/21/2010 03:35 PM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
This is used for git imap-send, and does not work for git-send-email
(I checked).
Following the relevant git send-email section
(http://wiki.winehq.org/GitWine#head-f09f3498e5910648468960a60ecf0f51b0fd4815
- Sending the patches using smtp), I set
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 4:26 PM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
Hi,
isn't there a problem with wine's configure script? I'm running on
new Debian Squezee and noticed (luckily), that when libice-dev is
installed, than ./configure can't find -lGLU.
But libice-dev doesn't have any influence on file
2010/8/21 Octavian Voicu octavian.vo...@gmail.com:
2010/8/21 GOUJON Alexandre ale.gou...@gmail.com:
[format]
headers = To: wine-patches wine-patc...@winehq.org\nReply-To:
wine-devel wine-devel@winehq.org\n
As the name of the section suggests, this adds header lines to files
generated
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4627
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4626
Your paranoid
Hi Stefan,
On Thursday 19 August 2010 15:40:53 Stefan Dösinger wrote:
This test contains a C++ comment, please remove it. Otherwise it looks ok,
as does patch 1
I will start sending patches one-by-one and wait until it is applied - as you
recommended. It will not contain the [PATCH x/y]
(Marvin) wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4626
37 matches
Mail list logo
