Vincent Povirk vinc...@codeweavers.com writes:
+/* Last: the registry */
+return get_mono_path_from_registry(path);
You probably want to check the registry first, to make it possible to
override the global install if necessary.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
W dniu 23.09.2010 15:40, (Marvin) pisze:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5430
Your paranoid
Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org writes:
@@ -1270,13 +1270,12 @@ AC_SUBST(RESOLVLIBS,)
if test $ac_cv_header_resolv_h = yes
then
ac_save_LIBS=$LIBS
-LIBS=$LIBS -lresolv
-AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[#ifdef HAVE_NETINET_IN_H
-#include netinet/in.h
-#endif
-#include
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5429
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5428
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5432
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5426
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5427
Your paranoid
That was why I was checking c:\windows\mono first.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Vincent Povirk vinc...@codeweavers.com writes:
+ /* Last: the registry */
+ return get_mono_path_from_registry(path);
You probably want to check the
Hi,
I'm not a winedbg expert but I think your mis-using it.
As it's your software, you can compile it from source and add debug info.
I know Visual Studio can create .pdb files but I don't know if winedbg
can use it.
Personally, I'm using gcc mingw with -g and that perfectly works.
The
Adam Martinson amartin...@codeweavers.com writes:
Ignore the previous stuff from me, rebased split into a patch set.
From bdc1ce7957ee1be31f4b39484285a164bc4ba6b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adam Martinson amartin...@codeweavers.com
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:02:47 -0500
Subject: [PATCH
On 23/09/10 06:51, Tom Grubbe wrote:
problem seems to be getting any kind of stack trace information from
the 64-bit winedbg. This used to work with the 32-bit version of winedbg.
I can confirm that wine64 winedbg can not produce valid backtraces for
multi-threaded programs (.exe + .pdb)
It's good to know someone else is also seeing these problems. In fact here's
my tiny test app that should produce a backtrace but does not with winedbg
64-bit:
% cat Crash.cpp
#include stdio.h
extern C void crash_func()
{
char* p = 0;
*p = 'x';
}
extern C int main()
{
crash_func();
I'm happy to provide test source code, 64-bit and 32-bit binaries and
matching PDB files, if anyone is interested in looking at the issue.
sure send me the .exe+pdb (+source) I'll have a look at it
I only tested winedbg on 64bit with gcc
A+
--
Eric Pouech
The problem with designing something
Looks like Microsoft has been letting the ie6 download servers rot.
Over the last few weeks, 'winetricks ie6' has been hanging occasionally,
and today, it's failing right off the bat with
wget http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/ie6sp1/download/rtw/x86/ie6sites.dat
...
Resolving
On 23 September 2010 23:01, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Looks like Microsoft has been letting the ie6 download servers rot.
Over the last few weeks, 'winetricks ie6' has been hanging occasionally,
and today, it's failing right off the bat with
wget
Sometimes it's not 100% clear whether a problem is in the packaging or
upstream part of Wine, and packaging bugs are just as much legitimate
problems as normal Wine bugs. WineHQ is often the best place to have
that discussion as 1) more than one packager would see it, and 2) if
we're doing
On 24/09/10 06:43, Eric Pouech wrote:
sure send me the .exe+pdb (+source) I'll have a look at it
Source and binaries sent to Eric in private, so that the list isn't
polluted with megabytes of binaries. If anyone else is interested in
having a copy, please let me know and I'll forward it in
19 matches
Mail list logo
