The attached patch attempts to fix
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24869 , but due to my limited
knowledge of DirectShow I'm not certain about its correctness. Can
anyone point out if there's anything wrong with it?From fa516d2c512b3c515a465d6e6d992f3f3d722b72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
On 10/30/2010 06:12 AM, Sami Aario wrote:
Added TokenOwner and TokenPrimaryGroup cases to NtSetInformationToken.
From: Sami Aario
Your e-mail isn't set correctly in git configuration.
dlls/ntdll/nt.c| 63
include/wine/server_protoco
The keyword might be useful for a pragmatist looking
for bugs to fix, who didn't want to fix bugs masked by
a bundled native DLL.
I don't know how many such people there are, though.
Best to wait until somebody says they need the keyword before we add it...
until then, we can just use the word 'pu
Hi Austin,
2010/10/30 Austin English :
> On Saturday, October 30, 2010, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>> On 30/10/10 19:25, Austin English wrote:
>>
>> I meant bugs that only occur by manually removing native dlls. The
>> report summaries are usually clear enough, I was hoping to get an easy
>> way to s
On Saturday, October 30, 2010, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 30/10/10 19:25, Austin English wrote:
>
> I meant bugs that only occur by manually removing native dlls. The
> report summaries are usually clear enough, I was hoping to get an easy
> way to search for them and separate them from 'normal'
On 30/10/10 19:25, Austin English wrote:
I meant bugs that only occur by manually removing native dlls. The
report summaries are usually clear enough, I was hoping to get an easy
way to search for them and separate them from 'normal' bugs.
I suspect your use of the word "native" is differe
On Saturday, October 30, 2010, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
>
>> I see quite a few people filing bugs that are only exposed when bundled
>> native dlls are removed. I think it would be good to be able to group these
>> bugs, perhaps with a 'purist' keyword. Anyone opposed?
>
>
Austin English wrote:
> I see quite a few people filing bugs that are only exposed when bundled
> native dlls are removed. I think it would be good to be able to group these
> bugs, perhaps with a 'purist' keyword. Anyone opposed?
Personally I don't see the point. The less keywords is the better
Any problem with this patch?
A+
David
Hi Martin,
> http://forum.evernote.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=18674
Thanks for letting us know.
Looking at that thread, your message, and the appdb entry
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=21775
it looks like people are reporting four or so problems:
- autoupdate does
Evernote are in the process of releasing 4.0 of their Windows client. This
is completely rewritten to avoid the use of things that would stop it
running under WINE. (This WASN'T their target - it was more about device
drivers that had been problematic.)
It runs reasonably well on the latest WIN
I see quite a few people filing bugs that are only exposed when bundled
native dlls are removed. I think it would be good to be able to group these
bugs, perhaps with a 'purist' keyword. Anyone opposed?
12 matches
Mail list logo