RFC: quartz: Don't block indefinitely when pausing after end of stream

2010-10-30 Thread Vladimir Panteleev
The attached patch attempts to fix http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24869 , but due to my limited knowledge of DirectShow I'm not certain about its correctness. Can anyone point out if there's anything wrong with it?From fa516d2c512b3c515a465d6e6d992f3f3d722b72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From:

Re: Added TokenOwner and TokenPrimaryGroup cases to NtSetInformationToken.

2010-10-30 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
On 10/30/2010 06:12 AM, Sami Aario wrote: Added TokenOwner and TokenPrimaryGroup cases to NtSetInformationToken. From: Sami Aario Your e-mail isn't set correctly in git configuration. dlls/ntdll/nt.c| 63 include/wine/server_protoco

re: Purist keyword?

2010-10-30 Thread Dan Kegel
The keyword might be useful for a pragmatist looking for bugs to fix, who didn't want to fix bugs masked by a bundled native DLL. I don't know how many such people there are, though. Best to wait until somebody says they need the keyword before we add it... until then, we can just use the word 'pu

Re: Purist keyword?

2010-10-30 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hi Austin, 2010/10/30 Austin English : > On Saturday, October 30, 2010, Shachar Shemesh wrote: >> On 30/10/10 19:25, Austin English wrote: >> >> I meant bugs that only occur by manually removing native dlls. The >> report summaries are usually clear enough, I was hoping to get an easy >> way to s

Re: Purist keyword?

2010-10-30 Thread Austin English
On Saturday, October 30, 2010, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > On 30/10/10 19:25, Austin English wrote: > > I meant bugs that only occur by manually removing native dlls. The > report summaries are usually clear enough, I was hoping to get an easy > way to search for them and separate them from 'normal'

Re: Purist keyword?

2010-10-30 Thread Shachar Shemesh
On 30/10/10 19:25, Austin English wrote: I meant bugs that only occur by manually removing native dlls. The report summaries are usually clear enough, I was hoping to get an easy way to search for them and separate them from 'normal' bugs. I suspect your use of the word "native" is differe

Re: Purist keyword?

2010-10-30 Thread Austin English
On Saturday, October 30, 2010, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > Austin English wrote: > >> I see quite a few people filing bugs that are only exposed when bundled >> native dlls are removed. I think it would be good to be able to group these >> bugs, perhaps with a 'purist' keyword. Anyone opposed? > >

Re: Purist keyword?

2010-10-30 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
Austin English wrote: > I see quite a few people filing bugs that are only exposed when bundled > native dlls are removed. I think it would be good to be able to group these > bugs, perhaps with a 'purist' keyword. Anyone opposed? Personally I don't see the point. The less keywords is the better

ddraw [try 3]: Add tests for the foreground window set by SetCooperativeLevel

2010-10-30 Thread David Adam
Any problem with this patch? A+ David

re: WINE Performance and Evernote 4.0 Windows Client

2010-10-30 Thread Dan Kegel
Hi Martin, > http://forum.evernote.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=18674 Thanks for letting us know. Looking at that thread, your message, and the appdb entry http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=21775 it looks like people are reporting four or so problems: - autoupdate does

WINE Performance and Evernote 4.0 Windows Client

2010-10-30 Thread Martin Packer
Evernote are in the process of releasing 4.0 of their Windows client. This is completely rewritten to avoid the use of things that would stop it running under WINE. (This WASN'T their target - it was more about device drivers that had been problematic.) It runs reasonably well on the latest WIN

Purist keyword?

2010-10-30 Thread Austin English
I see quite a few people filing bugs that are only exposed when bundled native dlls are removed. I think it would be good to be able to group these bugs, perhaps with a 'purist' keyword. Anyone opposed?