Peter Urbanec winehq@urbanec.net writes:
+static BOOL load_funcs(void *handle)
+{
+#define LOAD_FUNCPTR(f) if((p##f = (void*)wine_dlsym(handle, #f, NULL, 0))
== NULL) \
+{ ERR(Can not find #f \n); return FALSE; } else { TRACE(Loaded
function #f \n); };
+
+/* Platform API
André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de writes:
@@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ static BOOL run_winemenubuilder( const WCHAR *args )
GetSystemDirectoryW( app, MAX_PATH - sizeof(menubuilder)/sizeof(WCHAR) );
strcatW( app, menubuilder );
+if( GetFileAttributesW(app) == INVALID_FILE_ATTRIBUTES)
+
On 11/29/10 11:41 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi Jacek,
On 11/29/2010 12:18 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
---
dlls/mshtml/tests/htmldoc.c | 111
---
1 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
This one introduced some test failures:
Aric Stewart a...@codeweavers.com writes:
---
configure |8 +-
configure.ac |5 +
dlls/wineqtdecoder/Makefile.in| 11 +
dlls/wineqtdecoder/main.c | 135 +
dlls/wineqtdecoder/qtvdecoder.c |
Hi Jacek,
On 11/30/2010 01:38 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
+static HRESULT WINAPI PropertyNotifySink_OnChanged(IPropertyNotifySink *iface,
DISPID dispID)
+{
+if(dispID == DISPID_READYSTATE){
+BSTR state;
+HRESULT hres;
+
+static const WCHAR completeW[] =
Hello Alexandre,
attached is the list of translation patches for wine-1.2.2.
This time I manually checked the changes to the En.rc files if they are
indeed a wine-1.2 incompatible change. Thus there are some patches in
the list that I missed for wine-1.2.1 with the automatic stop at first
On 11/30/2010 01:56 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi Jacek,
On 11/30/2010 01:38 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
+static HRESULT WINAPI
PropertyNotifySink_OnChanged(IPropertyNotifySink *iface, DISPID dispID)
+{
+ if(dispID == DISPID_READYSTATE){
+ BSTR state;
+ HRESULT hres;
+
+ static const WCHAR completeW[]
Hi Paul,
On 11/30/10 2:46 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
Changing the lstrcmpW and using A-functions to create the window makes
the tests succeed on my win98 box (changed activex.c attached).
Thanks for catching it. How about this version:
http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/68936
I would prefer to
On 11/30/2010 03:42 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 11/30/10 2:46 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
Changing the lstrcmpW and using A-functions to create the window makes
the tests succeed on my win98 box (changed activex.c attached).
Thanks for catching it. How about this version:
On 11/30/10 3:49 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
On 11/30/2010 03:42 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 11/30/10 2:46 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
Changing the lstrcmpW and using A-functions to create the window makes
the tests succeed on my win98 box (changed activex.c attached).
Thanks for catching it.
Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com writes:
I can see that these tests may be useful sometimes, eg. if someone is
interested in old apps that don't run on new Windows. But the honest
true is that it's not what happens with our tests. All we usually do
with old Windows or old IEs is blindly
On Nov 30, 2010, at 6:52 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Aric Stewart a...@codeweavers.com writes:
---
configure |8 +-
configure.ac |5 +
dlls/wineqtdecoder/Makefile.in| 11 +
dlls/wineqtdecoder/main.c | 135
Alexander Puzankov alx...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I missed that MSDN says that the first parameter of the custom I/O
procedure
is of type LPSTR instead of LPMMIOINFO (could be this an error in the
documentation?).
Both PSDK and Wine headers use the same definition for MMIOPROC.
I can make
Sent a revised patch using the ICMDecompression apis just before seeing
your e-mail. So I figured out that part.
I will have to look into the pixel buffer copying improvement once the
base framework is in place.
thanks!
-aric
On 11/30/10 10:33 AM, Ken Thomases wrote:
On Nov 30, 2010, at
On 11/30/2010 04:41 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Jacek Cabanja...@codeweavers.com writes:
I can see that these tests may be useful sometimes, eg. if someone is
interested in old apps that don't run on new Windows. But the honest
true is that it's not what happens with our tests. All we
I'm all for removing stuff that nobody needs anymore. I imagine there
are still a few popular older apps that will force us to keep some old
win9x behaviors around, though, so we probably won't be able
to remove the 'emulate win98' choice from winecfg any time soon.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
I'm all for removing stuff that nobody needs anymore. I imagine there
are still a few popular older apps that will force us to keep some old
win9x behaviors around, though, so we probably won't be able
to remove the 'emulate
On 11/30/2010 08:53 PM, Eric Durbin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com
mailto:d...@kegel.com wrote:
I'm all for removing stuff that nobody needs anymore. I imagine there
are still a few popular older apps that will force us to keep some old
win9x
From: Paul Vriens
On 11/30/2010 04:41 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
The value of running tests on Win9x these days is certainly questionable.
We don't try to emulate the Win9x behavior anyway, except in a very few
cases (which most likely don't have tests...) so it only serves to
Ok, I missed that MSDN says that the first parameter of the custom I/O procedure
is of type LPSTR instead of LPMMIOINFO (could be this an error in the
documentation?). I can make cast in mmio_test_IOProc instead, something like:
static LRESULT CALLBACK mmio_test_IOProc(LPSTR lpMMIOInfo, UINT
It looks fine to me, but I'm worried whether it can work properly in
the end. A few months ago I worked on Cuda support for something (I
implemented nvcuda.dll which is what cuda runtime libraries like
cudart or physx are using). Certain lowlevel nvcuda applications
worked, but more fancy
21 matches
Mail list logo
