Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18050
Your paranoid
Is there no header that should define these?
On 26 April 2012 11:47, Józef Kucia joseph.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
+static HRESULT get_image_info_from_dds(LPCVOID buffer, DWORD length,
D3DXIMAGE_INFO *info)
Please avoid types like LPCVOID.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Henri Verbeet hverb...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there no header that should define these?
These structures and defines seem to be defined only in a D3D sample
DDS without D3DX.
On 26 April 2012 12:13, Józef Kucia joseph.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Henri Verbeet hverb...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there no header that should define these?
These structures and defines seem to be defined only in a D3D sample
DDS without D3DX.
I guess that's ok
Il 26 aprile 2012 11:47, Józef Kucia joseph.ku...@gmail.com ha scritto:
static D3DFORMAT dds_pixel_format_to_d3dformat(const struct dds_pixel_format
*pixel_format)
{
- FIXME(Pixel format conversion not implemented.\n);
+ if (pixel_format-flags DDS_PF_FOURCC)
+ return
Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2012, 11:47:51 schrieb Józef Kucia:
+DWORD pitch_or_linear_size;
Are you aware that lPitch is a (signed) LONG in the original DDSURFACEDESC
structure? Honestly I have no idea why, and I have never seen an app that
passes a negative pitch, but it might lead to obscure
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Stefan Dösinger stefandoesin...@gmx.at wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2012, 11:47:51 schrieb Józef Kucia:
+ DWORD pitch_or_linear_size;
Are you aware that lPitch is a (signed) LONG in the original DDSURFACEDESC
structure? Honestly I have no idea why, and I
