As instructed, I added a few lines to the already written tests that
confirm my claim.
Part of the research of the registry merging project was to determine
where the implementation is going to be written: advapi32, ntdll or
the server itself. The server choice was dismissed since HKCR isn't
store
Wine does not seem to even try to load DLLs at their preferred address. Still,
I'm not sure this is actually bad and I think Win8 forces randomization of the
layout anyway,
Alessandro
> He believes that this was done on purpose to break Wine and other non-
> Windows environments. It's an interf
You're right about RegOpenUserClassesRoot(). It'll just serve as another
way to RegOpenKeyEx(HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT) for now because wine doesn't yet
support multiple NT users.
For the list.. it's very strange. I've tested on my side and it does seem
that there's no difference whatsoever. But then what
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25605
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25604
Your paranoid android
Akihiro Sagawa writes:
> This change is useful for a bitmap font. Because its glyph index 0 isn't the
> default glyph in some cases.
This doesn't seem to match what GetGlyphIndices does, and we probably
don't want to do that in two different places.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
2013/5/17 Austin English
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Christian Costa
> wrote:
> > Also remove fixme in wined3d_device_get_software_vertex_processing since
> it does what it is supposed to do.
> > ---
> > dlls/wined3d/device.c | 12 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 d
On Fri, 17 May 2013 10:43:29 +0200
Piotr Caban wrote:
> On the other hand there are other benefits of preferring builtin dlls
> over native ones. Thanks to it the dll is tested by more users. Because
> there are no reported bugs related to msvcr90 I would prefer to use
> builtin dll in this ca
Tests for read-operations has been done.
http://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=942
All the results are expected:
1. query_value prefer values in hkcu.
2. query_key_info gives the count of subkeys and values distincted.
3. enum_value & enum_key combine result from hkcu & hklm and return in
On 16 May 2013, at 19:03, Alessandro Pignotti wrote:
On 16 May 2013, at 16:47, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Addendum: he just realised that you may be talking about multiple
base
relocation arrays for a single page (arrays that contain the offsets
of the instructions that need fixing up), which would
On 2013-05-16 12:01:21 -0500, Aric Stewart wrote:
> Hello Kusanagi-san,
>
> I am trying to do more testing with tategaki and i am finding that your
> original tests are incorrect because of the vertical.ttf font you have build.
>
> Windows appears to be very very picky about when it will to a ve
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25598
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25599
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25597
Your paranoid android
Hi George,
Di you notice this in that page:
The RegOpenUserClassesRoot function provides a merged view for
processes, such as services, that are dealing with clients other than
the interactive user
In
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms724899(v=vs.85).aspx
it says:
Applicat
On 05/17/13 10:47, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Piotr Caban wrote:
Just like msvcp60,msvcp70,msvcp71,msvcp80,msvcp100,msvcp110 do.
...
msvcp90 has some wine specific exports. This patch breaks other msvcpXX
dlls when native msvcp90 is installed.
Isn't that the case for other msvcp* dlls?
As f
Piotr Caban wrote:
> >>> Just like msvcp60,msvcp70,msvcp71,msvcp80,msvcp100,msvcp110 do.
> > ...
> >> msvcp90 has some wine specific exports. This patch breaks other msvcpXX
> >> dlls when native msvcp90 is installed.
> >
> > Isn't that the case for other msvcp* dlls?
> >
> As far as I remember m
On 05/17/13 10:22, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Piotr Caban wrote:
Just like msvcp60,msvcp70,msvcp71,msvcp80,msvcp100,msvcp110 do.
...
msvcp90 has some wine specific exports. This patch breaks other msvcpXX
dlls when native msvcp90 is installed.
Isn't that the case for other msvcp* dlls?
As f
Piotr Caban wrote:
> > Just like msvcp60,msvcp70,msvcp71,msvcp80,msvcp100,msvcp110 do.
...
> msvcp90 has some wine specific exports. This patch breaks other msvcpXX
> dlls when native msvcp90 is installed.
Isn't that the case for other msvcp* dlls?
--
Dmitry.
On 05/17/13 08:01, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Just like msvcp60,msvcp70,msvcp71,msvcp80,msvcp100,msvcp110 do.
---
dlls/msvcp90/msvcp90_main.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/dlls/msvcp90/msvcp90_main.c b/dlls/msvcp90/msvcp90_main.c
index 7a7aafe..ce56c14 10
As we know already from [1], the merge is going to happen according to
certain rules.
The list at the end of the page signifies which subkeys are going to be
*merged* from HKLM\Software\Classes\subkey and HKCU\Software\Classes\subkey
and not simply linked to.
Now there's a comment on the article t
Le 16/05/2013 15:03, Rosanne DiMesio a écrit :
On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:04:07 -0400
Hugh McMaster wrote:
My concern is with scenario (3). Wine is designed to be used with an X server,
but wineconsole can be used in non-X-based environment. While this is
possible, it would seem unlikely. Non
22 matches
Mail list logo
