I was thinking about looking at wininet soon myself, but haven't had
the time. I don't know what the right approach should be, but the
least I can tell you is stop including all the linux headers:
#ifdef HAVE_NETDB_H
# include netdb.h
#endif
#ifdef HAVE_NETINET_IN_H
# include sys/types.h
#
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Erich Hoover ehoo...@mines.edu wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Mike Kaplinskiy
mike.kaplins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Erich Hoover ehoo...@mines.edu wrote:
...
DWORD flags;
unsigned int
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Erich Hoover ehoo...@mines.edu wrote:
If you guys would mind looking over this revised patchset I would
greatly appreciate it, I believe I've appropriately included your
corrections. Please note that mswsock.h and ws2ipdef.h will be
submitted as separate
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Erich Hoover ehoo...@mines.edu wrote:
Is it acceptable to just add a parameter for WS2_recvfrom() or should
this function get renamed? This function currently mirrors
WSARecvFrom exactly.
Feel free to change the name if you want, I don't have any problems
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Erich Hoover ehoo...@mines.edu wrote:
Real Name:
Erich Hoover
Description:
While searching for something else I discovered a bug relevant to the
interface-bound UDP broadcast patches I've been working on. Apparently,
IP_PKTINFO does work on Windows
There are still a few style issues with your patch. You have inconsistent
spacing after ifs (if ( vs if(), missing spaces after commas, and a few
more }else{s. You also create a few blocks for no reason other than to get
around the C declarations on top of block rule. Please organize these in
tune
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Rudolf Mayerhofer r...@eightyfive.net wrote:
I don't know much about kernel32/ntdll, but I'm pretty sure that you
could get this to work through ntdll. NtQuerySystemInformation with
SystemProcessorInformation/SystemLogicalProcessorInformation (see
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Rudolf Mayerhofer r...@eightyfive.net wrote:
A rewrite of my previously sent patches in order to avoid changing
SYSTEM_CPU_INFORMATION.
This patch supersedes my previously sent patches:
[PATCH1/3] include/winternl: Add Logical Processor Information to
Mike Kaplinskiy mike.kaplins...@gmail.com:
Thanks for the feedback Alexandre. The complexity of the wine APC
I/O system never stops amazing me. Third time's the charm?
try 3: correctly use an apc to free internal async structures (which
would explain why we have the apc parameter...). Strangely
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Erich Hoover ehoo...@mines.edu wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Mike Kaplinskiy
mike.kaplins...@gmail.com wrote:
There's enough #ifdef's to make this mostly unreadable.
Sorry about this, I was concerned that pushing these out so that
changes do
A few broad comments:
- There's enough #ifdef's to make this mostly unreadable. It's hard
to think of the cases of no IP_PKTINFO availability, only compile time
availability or full availability. Please just write a few wrapper
functions for the #ifdef's that return sensible values if IP_PKTINFO
Ah sorry, forgot to mention one more thing - fd's are different on the
server side and the client side and between processes. So you're
locking different semaphores everywhere effectively not locking
anything.
Mike.
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Mike Kaplinskiy
mike.kaplins...@gmail.com
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Vincent Povirk vinc...@codeweavers.com wrote:
@@ -3193,6 +3193,10 @@ int WINAPI WS_select(int nfds, WS_fd_set *ws_readfds,
return SOCKET_ERROR;
}
+for (i=0; icount; i++)
+if (pollfds[i].fd == -1)
+return
CAP_NET_RAW should enable ping to work just fine I think. setuid seems
a little too dangerous on the current wineserver, we don't do many
checks and a few bugs on our side will turn the os into windows, and
not in a good way. Better stick to cap's for now while we don't need
all the uid 0
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org wrote:
On 09/12/2010 05:57 PM, Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
CAP_NET_RAW should enable ping to work just fine I think. setuid seems
a little too dangerous on the current wineserver, we don't do many
checks and a few bugs on our side
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Mike Kaplinskiy
mike.kaplins...@gmail.com wrote:
---
server/change.c | 2 ++
server/device.c | 1 +
server/fd.c | 18 --
server/file.c | 1 +
server/file.h | 3 +++
server/mailslot.c | 3
Several things:
- Don't set errno. For good practice it's more or less read-only.
- All the tests have to pass after each patch, so if your tests fail
(which they probably should) without your patch, add todo_wine and
then remove them in the followup patch (or just send the tests
second).
- The
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Mike Kaplinskiy
mike.kaplins...@gmail.com wrote:
---
dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c | 227
++
1 files changed, 227 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Shoot, any chance you can just take #1 and take 2-5 from the first
batch
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Wolfgang Schwotzer
wolfgang.schwot...@gmx.net wrote:
This fixes bug #19397
I don't think that's the right place for the fix. You should probably
put it in WS2_sendto. Also could you add some tests to verify that
this is the behavior for all protocols, not
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Pigeon pig...@pigeond.net wrote:
WSASendTo/WSARecvFrom, wrapped in a different function name, so that
internal calls from ws2_32 itself will not trigger programs like Garena,
which catches WSASendTo/WSARecvFrom calls.
Reference: Wine Bug Id #16047
---
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Max TenEyck Woodbury
m...@mtew.isa-geek.net wrote:
+#define WINE_FIXME_ONCE(args...) do { } while(0)
+#define WINE_FIXME_ONCE_ONCE_(ch) WINE_FIXME_ONCE
I think you want WINE_FIXME_ONCE_ not WINE_FIXME_ONCE_ONCE_.
+#define WINE_FIXME_ONCE(args...) do { }
You can move commits around in an interactive rebase. Just create an empty
commit, move it into place with rebase and edit it.
Sorry for top post, mobile gmail doesn't let you bottom post.
On Jul 9, 2010 8:56 PM, Misha Koshelev misha...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All:
I am still learning git and it
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Misha Koshelev misha...@gmail.com wrote:
Fyi I am just going to keep my latest patches here:
http://www.mkosh.com/wine-d3dx9.zip
I have struggled for an hour trying to remove a remote commit on github,
and that's an hour I'd rather spend implementing D3DX
:-)
Thanks again
Misha
On Jul 6, 2010 12:18 PM, Mike Kaplinskiy mike.kaplins...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Misha Koshelev misha...@gmail.com wrote:
Fyi I am just going to...
It shouldn't be too hard. Something like the below might work.
git rebase -i upstream/master
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Alan W. Irwin
ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote:
To introduce myself to this list, I am a complete Wine newbie with no
Windows experience at all, but I do have years of experience developing
software on Linux, and in the interests of testing that software on a
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Alan W. Irwin
ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote:
According to some old discussion
(http://www.mail-archive.com/wine-de...@winehq.com/msg15669.html) on
wine-devel it appears that __WINE__ was going to be the macro used to
identify the Wine platform,
However,
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy mike.kaplins...@gmail.com writes:
We *might* need to ignore POLLERR messages for UDP sockets, as the
condition is actually temporary and sock_try_event was hiding this.
It doesn't work here
2010/4/28 André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de:
confirmed by Mike Kaplinskiy
try 1 was on 4th November 2009
---
dlls/ws2_32/socket.c | 16 ++--
dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c b/dlls
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Greg Geldorp ggeld...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Octavian Voicu
octavian.vo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to get the Adobe Photoshop Elements 8.0 installer to work
and noticed the license screen doesn't show up when running the
installer using wine. A trace shows that a custom action
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy mike.kaplins...@gmail.com writes:
This won't work for implementing half-closed sockets. If we have only
the read half is closed, we will get POLLIN/0 recv indefinitely if we
keep polling (not POLLHUP
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy mike.kaplins...@gmail.com writes:
But I see your point that perhaps it doesn't belong in the main loop
when one of the halves gets closed. I guess we can keep sock_try_event
around but only use
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy mike.kaplins...@gmail.com writes:
Would allowing adding the fd to the poll loop after it has been
removed be more sane? Otherwise we have to resort to ugly things like
sock_try_event (which only half
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy mike.kaplins...@gmail.com writes:
Remove the fd from the poll list so we don't get POLLHUP/POLLERR
messages when we ask for no events
This is wrong, even when selecting for no events you want
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy mike.kaplins...@gmail.com writes:
---
server/async.c | 8
server/file.h | 1 +
server/sock.c | 26 +++---
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy mike.kaplins...@gmail.com writes:
POLLIN/POLLOUT are selected if we have pending asyncs (as they should
be), but we shouldn't add these as pending events since the associated
overlapped operations
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Paul Vriens
paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/24/2010 03:03 AM, Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
---
dlls/ws2_32/tests/Makefile.in | 2 +-
dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c | 735
+
2 files changed, 672 insertions(+), 65
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy mike.kaplins...@gmail.com writes:
Hope this makes the rationale a bit clearer. Although admittedly the
patch does allow for some busy waiting since
if (mask FD_READ || async_waiting( sock-read_q
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/22/2010 07:56 PM, Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
+
+ bret = GetOverlappedResult((HANDLE)dest,ov,bytesReturned, FALSE);
+ todo_wine ok(!bret GetLastError() == ERROR_NETNAME_DELETED, Did
not get disconnect
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Mike Kaplinskiy
mike.kaplins...@gmail.com wrote:
Also some style fixes. Sorry for the fuss over this :)
---
dlls/ws2_32/socket.c | 45 ++---
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Don't even look
There are many places where we need to do a conversion between the
unix errno and the windows ntstatus (and then sometimes to dos
errors). Here are some that I found:
http://source.winehq.org/source/server/file.c#L582
http://source.winehq.org/source/server/sock.c#L702
While we're on the subject of libxml2, there is a small problem with
the way we use xmlAddChild. msxml doesn't automatically coalesce text
nodes when two are next to each other in the tree and keeps them as
two separate entities (you call normalize to coalesce them). libxml2
does this
I think some time ago this was explained as a NOTABUG in freetype,
which actually obeys the font's preferences and if the font supplies
special images for smaller font sizes, it uses them WITHOUT aliasing
them, which seems logical. Windows seems to lazily alias everything.
If you can find a way
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Roderick Colenbrander
thunderbir...@gmail.com wrote:
Esstentially what happens is that using the SendMessage in
internal_SetPixelFormat we call 'set_win_format' in window.c. I can't
say why it fails perhaps no parent window is up yet..
Roderick
On Tue, Oct
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/25/2009 07:59 AM, Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
---
dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c | 46
+-
1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 9 deletions
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Nicholas LaRochenlaro...@vt.edu wrote:
I had a few issues applying your patches to the latest git revision, but I
did find equivalent functionality in wine-hacks. This solved my problem
however the code in this tree doesn't support AcceptEx with TCP.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Nicholas LaRochenlaro...@vt.edu wrote:
I ran into a bug last week regarding the lack of
SIO_GET_EXTENSION_FUNCTION_POINTER support in WSAIoctl.
Are there any outstanding issues preventing it's implementation?
Perhaps if anyone has worked in this area, are
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Nicholas LaRochenlaro...@vt.edu wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Nicholas LaRochenlaro...@vt.edu wrote:
I ran into a bug last week regarding the lack of
SIO_GET_EXTENSION_FUNCTION_POINTER support in WSAIoctl.
Are there any
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Fenixk19fenix...@mail.ru wrote:
Hello! I've already post the
bug(http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19713) on this subject, but i
need more help. So I've decided to write here.
There is a problem in wine. When I use asynchronous serial port read,
data never
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:51 AM, shanmukha sainath
addepallisainath.addepa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
These are the series of patches for SwitchDesktop and
OpenInputDesktop API implementation in user32.dll
SwitchDesktop API when called switches to another desktop and makes
it
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Juan Langjuan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mike, I have one minor nit on this patch:
+ if (wsa-read) HeapFree( GetProcessHeap(), 0, wsa-read );
Please don't check if (wsa-read) is NULL before calling HeapFree.
HeapFree already does the correct thing given NULL,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Marcus Meissnermar...@jet.franken.de wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 02:16:40PM -0700, chris ahrendt wrote:
Ok CPPCheck guys have repired the false positive but now get this:
$ ./cppcheck -q -a ../wine/wine/dlls/wineoss.drv/mixer.c
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:52 PM, chris ahrendtceltich...@yahoo.com wrote:
This is the result of running cppcheck 1.35 with the --all parm against
the august 27th Git tree:
[../wine-git/dlls/dbghelp/msc.c:88]: (possible error) Array index out of
bounds
[../wine-git/dlls/dbghelp/msc.c:89]:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:21 PM, chris ahrendtceltich...@yahoo.com wrote:
[../wine-git/dlls/msvcrt/tests/file.c:997]: (error) Resource leak: stream1
[../wine-git/dlls/msvcrt/tests/file.c:982]: (error) Deallocating a
deallocated pointer: stream2
[../wine-git/dlls/msvcrt/tests/file.c:966]:
From 60e82c0890e7f435afcd200752226ed1fa4ee669 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Kaplinskiy mike.kaplins...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 00:12:52 -0400
Subject: kernel32: implement CancelIoEx
---
dlls/kernel32/file.c| 26 ++
dlls/kernel32/kernel32.spec
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Marcus Meissnermar...@jet.franken.de wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 06:36:36PM -0700, chris ahrendt wrote:
[../wine-git/dlls/ntdll/server.c:802]: (error) Resource leak: fd
I do not fully understand the code (keep fd open to have to lock
existing?), but it is
Can someone test this on vista? It tests NtCancelIoFileEx. The goal is
to find out the order of arguments.
Thanks,
Mike.
diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/tests/file.c b/dlls/ntdll/tests/file.c
index 164c2da..174daa5 100644
--- a/dlls/ntdll/tests/file.c
+++ b/dlls/ntdll/tests/file.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Juan Langjuan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
It is calling recv() on a socket that was previously:
1) set to blocking with a WS_ioctlsock() call with cmd WS_FIONBIO
2) AsyncSelect()'ed that should make the socket non-blocking.
(snip)
while the second does not touch the
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Juan Langjuan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I think what Rein means is that the unix socket fd backing the windows
socket handle is always non-blocking - and if he is, he may be
correct:
http://source.winehq.org/source/server/sock.c#L578
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Juan Langjuan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Barry,
this was a handy writeup. Perhaps you could add it to the wiki?
Here's a page that you might add it to:
http://wiki.winehq.org/NativeOdbc
The user guide should probably point to the wiki, but that's a
Paul,
I don't like NT4 anymore. We're breaking up.
Does the attached patch fix the latest failures (not counting the
build warnings)?
Mike.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Paul Vrienspaul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
Paul (and anyone who can test on x86_64):
Can
André Hentschel wrote:
didnt want to change both variables, now its fine
sry for the noise
---
dlls/msi/join.c |5 +++--
dlls/msi/msiquery.c |4 ++--
dlls/msi/storages.c |2 +-
dlls/msi/streams.c |2 +-
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
+
Paul (and anyone who can test on x86_64):
Can you confirm that the new patch gives no failures?
Mike.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Paul Vrienspaul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
Paul,
Does the attached fix test failures on at least NT4? The 4000 test
failures
module is out.
Mike.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Paul Vrienspaul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
This tests the following AcceptEx scenario:
WSAAccept-CF_DEFER-AcceptEx
Windows seems to return the deferred socket with AcceptEx (verified on
XP 2K3).
Mike
max)
Mike.
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Paul Vrienspaul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
Can someone try this test on win2000+? This tests the
WSAAccept-Defer-AcceptEx scenario, and I've only verified the
behavior on xp.
Thanks,
Mike
Can someone try this test on win2000+? This tests the
WSAAccept-Defer-AcceptEx scenario, and I've only verified the
behavior on xp.
Thanks,
Mike
diff --git a/dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c b/dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c
index c90111d..f9856da 100644
--- a/dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c
+++
I'm looking for some comments regarding my (winsock part by Scott)
acceptex patch: http://bugs2.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22193 . This
is just preliminary and doesn't support receive (yet).
The approach was done to fix the server-side issues AJ had with
Scott's original patch, so server side
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Damjan Jovanovicdamjan@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Mike
Kaplinskiymike.kaplins...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been thinking about the correct way to implement AcceptEx, and
I was looking for comments about the approach. Note I know all of
I have been thinking about the correct way to implement AcceptEx, and
I was looking for comments about the approach. Note I know all of
these cases will require tests, I'm just listing them for problems
someone might see.
Wineserver changes:
- add an async* to the socket structure to track this
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Andrew
Eikumand...@brightnightgames.com wrote:
Attached to this email is a rough implementation of the main GDI+
containers functions. It performs correctly in a few simple tests I
ran on it, but it's not quite ready to send off to wine-patches. I'd
like to
I don't know about stubbing drivers, but I remember that
autodetection/registry wasn't accepted on the fallout 3 patch. I think
AJ would prefer something like
http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=f2e2e3e49947490368900ef06a92e1df1bc52820
but for driver dll strings.
But take my
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Roderick
Colenbranderthunderbir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Roderick
Colenbranderthunderbir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Erich Hooverehoo...@mines.edu wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Mike
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Erich Hooverehoo...@mines.edu wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Mike
Kaplinskiymike.kaplins...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Then perhaps when this mechanism is in place, we can add a way to have
1 general funnel dll and symlink it on prefix creation (if it's
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Stefan Dösingerstefandoesin...@gmx.at wrote:
*) If we create a stub / thunk driver for each known windows display driver,
we potentially have all those thunks around. E.g. an app might complain that
it finds BOTH nv4_disp.dll AND atiumdag.dll.
*) Providing
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Ben Kleinshackl...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/15 Mike Kaplinskiy mike.kaplins...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Stefan Dösingerstefandoesin...@gmx.at
wrote:
*) If we create a stub / thunk driver for each known windows display
driver,
we
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Max,
From what I understand, the problem is not your design. I don't want
to put words in anyone's mouth, but to me it seems you and AJ agree on
the final goal; Alexandre just doesn't want the intermediary step in
2009/5/25 André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de:
Hi,
If i log in with both Checkboxes selected, i can do exactly one thing, and
then i am logged out again.
For example: if i am on a bug and log in, i can write a comment and got
logged out.
if i log in and select add an
I believe mesa looks for libtxc_dxtn @
http://homepage.hispeed.ch/~rscheidegger/dri_experimental/s3tc_index.html
and then enables full s3tc support. The library itself is tiny and in
(ugly) C, so that is already good news. But as stated on the website,
you cannot use the code due to legality.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Christopher Harvey
ch...@basementcode.com wrote:
I just built wine out of git.
Ran this:
wine-git $ find . -name winedbg
./programs/winedbg
notice there is no winedbg program. The output there is a folder only.
Where is the winedbg program within the git
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:08 PM, James Hawkins trui...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Mike Kaplinskiy
mike.kaplins...@gmail.com wrote:
I was looking at the trace of the crash from bug 17600
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 10:36 PM, James Hawkins trui...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Mike Kaplinskiy
mike.kaplins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:08 PM, James Hawkins trui...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Austin English austinengl
2009/5/3 James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net:
Ken Sharp wrote:
Nicklas Börjesson wrote:
I think that the users should have quite a say with regards to how
important a bug is, because for every user putting in the
(considerable for a user) effort of reporting a bug, there are dozens
I was looking at the trace of the crash from bug 17600, and it looks like
a custom action is calling MsiViewExecute with a null hRec.
I (sadly) don't know much about the wine MSI architecture, but the
msiobj_lock on line 484 should fail since rec will never be fetched
(null). I think the
James Hawkins wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Mike Kaplinskiy
mike.kaplins...@gmail.com wrote:
I was looking at the trace of the crash from bug 17600, and it looks
like a custom action is calling
84 matches
Mail list logo
