[resent]
Let's see.
This feature has been confirmed by popular vote at
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10495
They should stop voting for a redundant feature.
Nobody submitted to wine-patches before, I prefer let Alexandre choose
what he wants to do with it.
If they want to have it
[resent]
Let's see.
If distros include this driver, they This feature has been
confirmed by popular vote at
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10495
They should stop voting for a redundant feature.
Nobody submitted to wine-patches before, I prefer let Alexandre chose
what he wants
Selon Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 02:58:22PM +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
So did you ;) Here's a merge of both.
I don't do this on purpose, but you missed win.h again :)
Again, with feeling...
--
Dimi.
win.h still exists...
Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rémi Assailly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
diff -u dlls/x11drv/x11drv_main.c dlls/x11drv/x11drv_main.c
--- dlls/x11drv/x11drv_main.c 2004-12-08 18:27:53.0 +0100
+++ dlls/x11drv/x11drv_main.c 2005-01-12 21:23:02.0 +0100
@@ -119,6
Selon Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Rémi Assailly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- include/wine/library.h 2005-01-07 19:41:26.0 +0100
+++ include/wine/library.h 2005-01-07 19:49:41.389057824 +0100
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
extern void *wine_dlopen( const char *filename, int flag
Hi all !
This mail is a resent because I noticed that it does not appear in
wine-devel...
I started a work to get rid of GDI_GetObjPtr and GDI_ReleaseObj in
x11drv but I am not sure if have chosen a good way.
This patch is incomplete : some GDI_* are still staying, those that
cannot be removed
Alexandre Julliard wrote :
Rmi Assailly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Changelog:
* get rid of dce.h
--- dlls/x11drv/winpos.c 2004-12-09 19:10:35.0 +0100
+++ dlls/x11drv/winpos.c 2004-12-11 19:46:03.0 +0100
@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@
#include "x11drv.h"
#include "win.h"
Alexandre Julliard wrote :
Sure, we can move out definitions that are not needed by other dlls,
as long as they are for things that won't need to be changed when
getting rid of the dll dependencies. For DCE and more generally for
all user32 headers I'd suggest leaving them alone for now, they are
Jon Griffiths wrote :
Hi,
x11drv: 8 includes removed.
Cheers,
Jon
+dlls/x11drv/text.c dlls/x11drv/window.c dlls/x11drv/winpos.c
dlls/x11drv/x11ddraw.c
Remove uneeded headers to reduce uneeded rebuilds.
Hi Jon,
As I am working on x11drv I can tell you some things : win.h is declared
in
Alexandre Julliard wrote :
The easy stuff has been done already...
Otherwise there would be nothing to do !
I noticed that in gdi.h PC_SYS_MAPPED is unused and PC_SYS_RESERVED is
only used in dlls/x11drv/palette.c
I think we can remove PC_SYS_MAPPED and move PC_SYS_RESERVED to
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote :
/* Make the window visible on the screen */
ShowWindow (hwnd, nFunsterStil);
Insert UpdateWindow(hwnd); here.
PrintBmp(hwnd, "BOARD.bmp");
Thanks, it works. Now I can work !
Rmi
Rémi Assailly wrote:
Sorry, I prefer that ;)
What I wanted to know was if my implementation of GetLayout was correct
before trying to implement SetLayout ( and add mirroring in all
functions which need to check it ... ) or what was incorrect to fix it !
Okay, I will do what you advise me to do
I tested a program ( an other one, with source code this time )
On my Windows XP system I have no problem.
When I use Wine I just get a window. ( where is my bitmap ? )
Then I tried this : WINEDEBUG=gdi wine progtest and as Wine is slower
I could see my bitmap, which disappeared as fast as it
Shachar Shemesh a écrit :
Rémi Assailly wrote:
Shachar Shemesh wrote :
Thanks for spotting another one for my growing heap of BiDi TODOs
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2584
Shachar
I know that there is no effect...
I'm sorry if I came off cynical. There was no cynicism
I would like to know if my implementation of GetLayout is clean.
I did not found any information about GetLayout16, I would like to know
if it is correct too.
Thanks
Rémi
diff -u dlls/gdi/dc.c dlls/gdi/dc.c
--- dlls/gdi/dc.c 2004-11-21 18:34:03.0 +0100
+++ dlls/gdi/dc.c 2004-11-21
I tested a software ( a monopoly game ) and the error was that a
sound was still playing so I think that is not a wine bug.
Before submitting this patch to wine-patches I would like to know what
do you think about it, what should be WARN, FIXME, if choosing ERR to
all is correct or if some
Andreas Mohr wrote :
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 02:30:55PM +0100, Rmi Assailly wrote:
I tested a software ( a monopoly game ) and the error was that a sound
was still playing so I think that is not a wine bug.
Before submitting this patch to wine-patches I would like to know
17 matches
Mail list logo