Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2346
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2342
Your paranoid
Aric Stewart a...@codeweavers.com writes:
@@ -530,12 +591,18 @@ static BOOL CALLBACK
_ImmAssociateContextExEnumProc(HWND hwnd, LPARAM lParam)
*/
BOOL WINAPI ImmAssociateContextEx(HWND hWnd, HIMC hIMC, DWORD dwFlags)
{
+IMMThreadData* thread_data = NULL;
+
TRACE((%p, %p,
Akihiro Sagawa sagawa@gmail.com writes:
@@ -6519,11 +6519,17 @@ static DWORD get_glyph_outline(GdiFont
*incoming_font, UINT glyph, UINT format,
}
lpgm-gmBlackBoxX = (right - left) 6;
+if (lpgm-gmBlackBoxX == 0)
+lpgm-gmBlackBoxX = 1;
lpgm-gmBlackBoxY =
Jactry jactr...@gmail.com writes:
+chBuffer = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, size+2);
+if(!chBuffer)
+{
+CloseHandle(hFile);
+return HRESULT_FROM_WIN32(GetLastError());
+}
It's not useful to zero the buffer since you are reading into it. Also
Aric Stewart a...@codeweavers.com writes:
@@ -1684,7 +1684,7 @@ UINT WINAPI ImmGetDescriptionA(
HeapFree( GetProcessHeap(), 0, buf );
- return len;
+ return min( len - 1, uBufLen );
}
This may do the right thing on failure, but in an ugly way. A few
overflow tests would be a
Daniel Wendt daniel.we...@linux.com writes:
@@ -308,6 +308,11 @@ static int get_arc_points( PHYSDEV dev, const RECT
*rect, POINT start, POINT end
}
memmove( points, points + count, (pos - count) * sizeof(POINT) );
+
+if (GetGraphicsMode( dev-hdc ) == GM_ADVANCED)
+{
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2349
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2350
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2352
Your paranoid
Sebastian Lackner sebast...@fds-team.de writes:
---
dlls/winex11.drv/event.c | 99
+++---
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
These should go in the patches that need them. Also you should start
your series with reparent support, the
Hi Ben, thanks for having a whack at this.
Some tests would be nice.
-static HCERTCHAINENGINE CRYPT_defaultChainEngine;
+/* There are two default chain engines which correspond to
HCCE_CURRENT_USER and
+ * HCCE_LOCAL_MACHINE.
+*/
+static HCERTCHAINENGINE CRYPT_defaultChainEngine[2] = { NULL,
On 08/18/13 04:14, Zhenbo Li wrote:
I've tested some websites, and found that these pages have problems:
http://mail.163.com (it will make gecko crash)
http://huaban.com (nothing can be shown)
http://douban.com (no pictures)
http://html5test.com/ (can't load
Aric Stewart a...@codeweavers.com writes:
---
dlls/imm32/imm.c | 153
+--
1 file changed, 116 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
It breaks the tests:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M urlmon.dll -T ../../.. -p
urlmon_test.exe.so url.c
2013/9/24 Rico Schüller kgbric...@web.de:
---
dlls/d3dx9_36/effect.c | 248
+++--
1 Datei geändert, 95 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 153 Zeilen entfernt(-)
I definitely like the direction this patch takes.
@@ -5068,6 +5009,9 @@ static HRESULT
On 9/25/2013 16:03, Aric Stewart wrote:
defaultContext = ImmCreateContext();
+if (defaultContext)
+((InputContextData*)defaultContext)-threadDefault = TRUE;
I think a nicer way is to let ImmCreateContext() set this attribute.
On 9/25/2013 16:03, Aric Stewart wrote:
+if (!thread_data-defaultContext)
+{
+HIMC defaultContext;
+LeaveCriticalSection(threaddata_cs);
+defaultContext = ImmCreateContext();
+thread_data = IMM_GetThreadData(0);
Why do you need to unlock/lock around
On 25.09.2013 14:02, Matteo Bruni wrote:
2013/9/24 Rico Schüller kgbric...@web.de:
---
dlls/d3dx9_36/effect.c | 248
+++--
1 Datei geändert, 95 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 153 Zeilen entfernt(-)
I definitely like the direction this patch takes.
@@
On 9/25/13 7:11 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 9/25/2013 16:03, Aric Stewart wrote:
+if (!thread_data-defaultContext)
+{
+HIMC defaultContext;
+LeaveCriticalSection(threaddata_cs);
+defaultContext = ImmCreateContext();
+thread_data =
On 9/25/13 7:09 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 9/25/2013 16:03, Aric Stewart wrote:
defaultContext = ImmCreateContext();
+if (defaultContext)
+((InputContextData*)defaultContext)-threadDefault = TRUE;
I think a nicer way is to let ImmCreateContext() set this
Hi Hans,
Sorry for the delay, I wanted to test it a bit more before answering.
On 09/23/13 10:50, Hans Leidekker wrote:
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 17:38 +0200, Jacek Caban wrote:
I was hoping for a test like the attached one, which shows that there is
still more work to do. But it's a step in the
On 25 September 2013 15:32, Rico Schüller kgbric...@web.de wrote:
Yes. Depending on the use case we may create it on the Begin/BeginPass when
the shader is needed the first time (this may also be something like
isParameterUsed or GetVertexShader). We don't need the shaders for cases
like
Am 25.09.2013 12:19, schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
Sebastian Lackner sebast...@fds-team.de writes:
---
dlls/winex11.drv/event.c | 99
+++---
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
These should go in the patches that need them. Also you
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Marvin test...@winehq.org wrote:
=== w7pro64 (32 bit comm) ===
comm.c:863: Test failed: WaitCommEvent failed with a timeout
comm.c:875: recovering after WAIT_TIMEOUT...
comm.c:886: Test failed: WaitCommEvent error 0
comm.c:888: Test
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2332
Your paranoid
Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr wrote:
=== w7pro64 (32 bit comm) ===
comm.c:863: Test failed: WaitCommEvent failed with a timeout
comm.c:875: recovering after WAIT_TIMEOUT...
comm.c:886: Test failed: WaitCommEvent error 0
comm.c:888: Test failed: WaitCommEvent: expected EV_TXEMPTY,
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
[...]
This VM is broken,
How so? That is: what should I do to fix it?
Investigate, find the source of failures and fix it? Note, that all
other VMs pass this test just fine, moreover, this same w7pro64 VM
doesn't always fail.
You
Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr wrote:
This VM is broken,
How so? That is: what should I do to fix it?
Investigate, find the source of failures and fix it? Note, that all
other VMs pass this test just fine, moreover, this same w7pro64 VM
doesn't always fail.
You obviously
On 23 September 2013 21:05, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Henri Verbeet hverb...@codeweavers.com writes:
---
dlls/wined3d/device.c | 51
+
dlls/wined3d/stateblock.c |5 +
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 36
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2313
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2314
Your paranoid
The failure is not caused by the error from my patch,Isn't it?
It seems that the number 2232.
Original Message
Subject:Re: add ualapi directory (try 9
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 04:02:32 -0500
From: Marvin test...@winehq.org
To: matyapir...@gmail.com
CC:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2315
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2316
Your paranoid
Any help for this?
--
I'm testing support for GetConsoleScreenBufferInfoEx.
At the moment, I've extended the screen_buffer struct in server/console.c to
look like this:
struct screen_buffer
{
struct object obj;
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2317
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2318
Your paranoid
Thanks, Dan.
No. I already have that virus sample file.
For the more fun, W32:Tenga (aka Virus:Win32/Gael.D) virus behavior
signature under Wine 1.7.1 attached.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Thanks, looks like you're doing good work there.
(Are you going to
Am 24.09.2013 17:13, schrieb Huw Davies:
---
configure.ac| 1 +
server/ptrace.c | 8 +++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
is that for the warning about the missing casts?
On 24 Sep 2013, at 17:57, André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de wrote:
is that for the warning about the missing casts?
No, this actually introduces more :-)
The cast warning is about the 4th param of ptrace.
Huw.
Aric Stewart a...@codeweavers.com writes:
@@ -443,6 +473,28 @@ static InputContextData* get_imc_data(HIMC hIMC)
return data;
}
+static BOOL ensure_default_imc(IMMThreadData** thread_data)
+{
+if (!(*thread_data)-defaultContext)
+{
+HIMC defaultContext;
+
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2330
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2309
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2310
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2311
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2250
Your paranoid
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 17:38 +0200, Jacek Caban wrote:
I was hoping for a test like the attached one, which shows that there is
still more work to do. But it's a step in the right direction, so I'm
fine with your patch.
The issue here is that HTTP_ReceiveRequestData calls refill_read_buffer,
Fun++;
/* Wine Virus Database (VirusDB)
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/zerowine-tryout/index.php?title=VirusDB*/
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Fun times:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34556
Thanks, looks like you're doing good work there.
(Are you going to ask the guy who filed 34556 for a copy of an infected file?)
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Jong Bin, Chae c...@trunk.so wrote:
Fun++;
/* Wine Virus Database (VirusDB)
On 23 September 2013 13:29, Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com wrote:
Note that Windows drivers disagree on which format they support. Nvidia
has V16U16, AMD supports Q8W8V8U8, at least on r200. I am working on a
more comprehensive converted format test that tests all supported signed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2013-09-23 17:29, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
On 23 September 2013 13:29, Stefan Dösinger
ste...@codeweavers.com wrote:
Note that Windows drivers disagree on which format they support.
Nvidia has V16U16, AMD supports Q8W8V8U8, at least on r200. I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2013-09-23 17:31, schrieb Stefan Dösinger:
Am 2013-09-23 17:29, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
On 23 September 2013 13:29, Stefan Dösinger
ste...@codeweavers.com wrote:
Note that Windows drivers disagree on which format they
support. Nvidia has
Hi Akira,
On 09/23/13 10:00, Akira Nakagawa wrote:
From 2ecc71fdb3406d3cf79ebcbd7f6d0c711b68d699 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id:
2ecc71fdb3406d3cf79ebcbd7f6d0c711b68d699.1379923234.git.matyapir...@gmail.com
From: Akira Nakagawa matyapir...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 17:00:04
Sebastian Lackner sebast...@fds-team.de writes:
- when virtually reparenting the plugin window as a child of a
foreign window (similar to the systray code) its not possible to get
the focus anymore - the focus code always tries to request the focus for
the WS_POPUP parent, which is a
-- Forwarded message --
From: Carol Smith car...@google.com
Date: Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:04 PM
Subject: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Re: GSoC 2013 Mentors/Org Admins:
Pencils Down and Final Evaluation Dates Approaching
To: GSoC Mentors Announce gsoc-mentors-annou...@googlegroups.com
Henri Verbeet hverb...@codeweavers.com writes:
---
dlls/wined3d/device.c | 51
+
dlls/wined3d/stateblock.c |5 +
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
It doesn't work here:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2267
Your paranoid
Marvin test...@winehq.org wrote:
=== w7pro64 (32 bit comm) ===
comm.c:863: Test failed: WaitCommEvent failed with a timeout
comm.c:875: recovering after WAIT_TIMEOUT...
comm.c:886: Test failed: WaitCommEvent error 0
comm.c:888: Test failed: WaitCommEvent: expected EV_TXEMPTY, got 0
Dmitry Timoshkov dmi...@baikal.ru wrote:
Marvin test...@winehq.org wrote:
=== w7pro64 (32 bit comm) ===
comm.c:863: Test failed: WaitCommEvent failed with a timeout
comm.c:875: recovering after WAIT_TIMEOUT...
comm.c:886: Test failed: WaitCommEvent error 0
comm.c:888: Test failed:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2280
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2281
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2282
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2286
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2289
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2290
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2292
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2291
Your paranoid
Am 21.09.2013 19:49, schrieb paul.clark...@btinternet.com:
Hi,
I am new to WINE and indeed winebuild. What I need to do is write a wrapper C
part and Spec file and build a wrapper around an existing Linux shared
library so that my wrapper DLL can be dynamically loaded into my program
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2304
Your paranoid
Fun times:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34556
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2308
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2251
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2252
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2253
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2254
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2255
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2256
Your paranoid
Hi,
I am new to WINE and indeed winebuild. What I need to do is write a wrapper C
part and Spec file and build a wrapper around an existing Linux shared library
so that my wrapper DLL can be dynamically loaded into my program running in
WINE. This, I believe, is supposed to be a simple thing
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2257
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2259
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2262
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2263
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2266
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2268
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2270
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2269
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2271
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2273
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2275
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2276
Your paranoid
Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alist...@hotmail.com writes:
@@ -26,6 +26,20 @@ import oledb.idl;
#define vi_progid(str)
#endif
+#ifdef _WIN64
+cpp_quote(#ifdef _WIN64)
+typedef LONGLONG COMPATIBLE_LONG;
+cpp_quote(#else)
+cpp_quote(typedef LONG COMPATIBLE_LONG;)
Aric Stewart a...@codeweavers.com writes:
@@ -507,7 +524,7 @@ HIMC WINAPI ImmAssociateContext(HWND hWnd, HIMC hIMC)
LeaveCriticalSection(threaddata_cs);
defaultContext = ImmCreateContext();
((InputContextData*)defaultContext)-threadDefault = TRUE;
-
That change looks suspicious. If switching to i+1 fixes a problem, the real
problem is that the if-statement in question gets entered in the first
place. Some bounds checking on the outer for-loop (the one which loops
through nCfgs and nMaxFormats), is probably wrong then. I had issues with
this
On 20 September 2013 13:04, Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com wrote:
-volume-flags = ~(WINED3D_VFLAG_ALLOCATED |
WINED3D_VFLAG_SRGB_ALLOCATED);
+volume-flags = ~(WINED3D_VFLAG_ALLOCATED | WINED3D_VFLAG_SRGB_ALLOCATED
+| WINED3D_VFLAG_CLIENT_STORAGE);
Indentation looks a
On 20 September 2013 13:04, Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com wrote:
+static BOOL wined3d_volume_can_evict(const struct wined3d_volume *volume)
+{
+if (volume-resource.pool != WINED3D_POOL_MANAGED)
+return FALSE;
+if (volume-download_count 10)
+return FALSE;
Stefan, are these patches already present in the wine 1.7.2 release? Now
that the official 1.7.2 Ubuntu packages have been published, I'm trying to
figure out how to get your CSMT changes into the PPA that I maintain.
On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:44 AM, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
That change looks suspicious. If switching to i+1 fixes a problem, the real
problem is that the if-statement in question gets entered in the first
place. Some bounds checking on the outer for-loop (the one which loops
through nCfgs and
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Huw Davies h...@codeweavers.com wrote:
---
configure.ac | 3 +-
dlls/iphlpapi/ifenum.c | 199
-
2 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Hi, Huw. I'm not sure this is an issue but in the
On 19 Sep 2013, at 15:07, Bruno Jesus wrote:
Hi, Huw. I'm not sure this is an issue but in the android
implementation of get_interface_indexes you are not setting
+if (table) *table = NULL;
Hi Bruno,
Good catch! Resent.
Thanks,
Huw.
Hi Hans,
On 09/18/13 13:40, Hans Leidekker wrote:
diff --git a/dlls/wininet/tests/http.c b/dlls/wininet/tests/http.c
index bf57223..2526681 100644
--- a/dlls/wininet/tests/http.c
+++ b/dlls/wininet/tests/http.c
@@ -4777,8 +4777,37 @@ static const struct notification
201 - 300 of 74996 matches
Mail list logo
