Jeremy White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My driving concern is that I think we need to welcome the Mac
community to the Wine Project and do all that we can to
enable the Mac developers and users to use mainstream Wine resources.
I don't think anyone wants www.winehq.org to be perceived as
a
Joshua Root wrote:
C.W. Betts wrote:
If you could have it so that wine-macos is instantly sent to
darwine-devel, and vice-versa.
That seems rather redundant. Might as well just migrate all the
darwine-devel subscribers over to wine-macos and discontinue the former,
rather than have two
If you could have it so that wine-macos is instantly sent to darwine-devel,
and vice-versa.
That being the case, why not clear up the name? Call
the list [EMAIL PROTECTED] This makes clear it is for
the ppc version, not the Intel version. The currently
proposed name makes me think that the project refers
to both Intel and PPC.
Dave
--- Jim White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua
At 5:05 PM -0500 6/1/06, Jeremy White wrote:
Some Mac folks have told me privately that having a Mac specific mailing
list on www.winehq.org would make it more inviting to them.
Perhaps that is reason alone to make the change.
What do others think?
+1
mark
--
On Friday 02 June 2006 00:12, Mark F. Murphy wrote:
At 5:05 PM -0500 6/1/06, Jeremy White wrote:
Some Mac folks have told me privately that having a Mac specific mailing
list on www.winehq.org would make it more inviting to them.
Perhaps that is reason alone to make the change.
What do
Jim White wrote:
Brian Vincent wrote:
HOWEVER...
I say create wine-macos but remove darwine-devel - keeping it would be
too confusing. User-level stuff can go to wine-macos and devel stuff
can go to wine-devel.
What? And make the millions of PowerPC Mac owners cry? I don't think
so.
