Re: {Heap,Global,Local,}ReAlloc status (take 2)

2003-10-14 Thread Michael Günnewig
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi folks, > > Oleg has been doing a lot of good work, and we are now > down to 73 HeapReAlloc and 73 non-HeapReAlloc entries > to review. I'm still not sure how the comctl32.ReAlloc() > should behave, any help in getting that resolved would > be hig

Re: {Heap,Global,Local,}ReAlloc status (take 2)

2003-10-11 Thread Alexandre Julliard
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oleg has been doing a lot of good work, and we are now > down to 73 HeapReAlloc and 73 non-HeapReAlloc entries > to review. I'm still not sure how the comctl32.ReAlloc() > should behave, any help in getting that resolved would > be highly appreciate

{Heap,Global,Local,}ReAlloc status (take 2)

2003-10-11 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
Hi folks, Oleg has been doing a lot of good work, and we are now down to 73 HeapReAlloc and 73 non-HeapReAlloc entries to review. I'm still not sure how the comctl32.ReAlloc() should behave, any help in getting that resolved would be highly appreciated. Here is the update list: ./controls/edit.c