Andreas Mohr wrote:
Sure, but that's a moot point, since everybody will work as much on stuff
as he wants to see it progress, and that won't be too much in the Win16
case since it's of not too much interest as compared to Win32 (or probably
even Win64 relatively soon).
So, if john wants to play
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 05:06:31PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
People are often migrating to Linux PRECISELY BECAUSE newer Windows versions
are no alternative to them any more (old machines with insufficient
performance/compatibility with newer Windows versions).
And we better make sure we
Hi,
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 08:09:39PM -0500, Dustin Navea wrote:
I was wondering, since I have been away for so long, are we still
implementing functionality for 16-bit programs? The reason I ask is
because the freecell and solitaire from Win98/ME will not load in wine,
while the ones
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 08:09:39PM -0500, Dustin Navea wrote:
I was wondering, since I have been away for so long, are we still
implementing functionality for 16-bit programs? The reason I ask is
because the freecell and solitaire from Win98/ME will not load in wine,
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A real PE file has an NE header, which has a MZ header. Usually, these
headers just tell whoever is trying to run the application that this
is a 32 bit application. One can, however, generate a DLL which is
both a 32 and a 16 bit DLL.
No, there's no
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Hi,
As has been mentioned before on WD, cards.dll is a very obvious Microsoft
screwup, since both 16bit and 32bit DLL carry the same name, which is a big
no-no.
I really don't think we want to patch our loader like mad to accomodate for such
a stupid mistake.
Figures.. they
Hi,
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 03:47:52PM -0500, Dustin Navea wrote:
Figures.. they are always FUBAR'ing things lol..
That's just normal in software development.
But MS does seem to have some special skills there ;)
Instead, maybe we should implement cards16.dll and cards.dll.
Then maybe there
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Do we want to throw out the baby with the bath water?
In this case it's an obvious conflict between 16bit and 32bit, and note that
it's even with a very rarely used DLL, thus it's easy to give up on it.
In all other cases in which 16bit and 32bit can happily co-exist I don't
Dustin Navea wrote:
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Do we want to throw out the baby with the bath water?
In this case it's an obvious conflict between 16bit and 32bit, and
note that
it's even with a very rarely used DLL, thus it's easy to give up on it.
In all other cases in which 16bit and 32bit can
I was wondering, since I have been away for so long, are we still
implementing functionality for 16-bit programs? The reason I ask is
because the freecell and solitaire from Win98/ME will not load in wine,
while the ones from 2k/XP will. This is obviously due to the fact that
our cards.dll
On 05/08/2005 03:09:39 AM, Dustin Navea wrote:
Basically, I just need to know for the purposes of resolving this
bug, should I leave it open and confirmed so that someone knows to
implement the 16-bit functions (32 - 16 bit conversions?), or
should I just go ahead and close it as WONTFIX?
11 matches
Mail list logo
