Dan Kegel wrote:
As Andreas Mohr pointed out a while back,
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-August/039602.html
we really need a win16 test suite to make sure our
win16 support doesn't rot. As far as I know, nobody's
managed to get win16 tests into the tree, presumably
because the
On 7/9/07, Markus Amsler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have to distinguish between win16 and dos tests.
Absolutely. dos .com executables currently don't work,
but win16 .exe's with the same contents do work.
I plan to test DOS .com files using very simple pure assembly.
(That was the real way
Dan Kegel wrote:
On 7/9/07, Markus Amsler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have to distinguish between win16 and dos tests.
Absolutely. dos .com executables currently don't work,
but win16 .exe's with the same contents do work.
I plan to test DOS .com files using very simple pure assembly.
(That
As Andreas Mohr pointed out a while back,
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-August/039602.html
we really need a win16 test suite to make sure our
win16 support doesn't rot. As far as I know, nobody's
managed to get win16 tests into the tree, presumably
because the build process or
