> Is there a formal process for reviewing an arguably incompetent
> bugzilla staffer? Obviously it wouldn't be to submit their name as a
> bug. But is there any defined administrative layer that concerns
> itself with people on that level who are dragging on the project?
>
On Thursday 02 August 2007, Chris Morgan wrote:
> > Rewriting:
> >
> > We can conclude that VM was distracted first by the mention of the
> > ies4lin and second by attempts to attribute the problem to ies4lin, and
> > that, because of these distractions, he was unable to assess properly the
> > iss
Chris Morgan wrote:
On 8/2/07, Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 01 August 2007, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Hi,
Is there a formal process for reviewing an arguably incompetent bugzilla
staffer? Obviously it wouldn't be to submit their name as a bug. But is
th
> Rewriting:
>
> We can conclude that VM was distracted first by the mention of the ies4lin and
> second by attempts to attribute the problem to ies4lin, and that, because of
> these distractions, he was unable to assess properly the issue at hand. One
> also concludes that VM over-relied on the fe
On 8/2/07, Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 August 2007, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> > Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there a formal process for reviewing an arguably incompetent bugzilla
> > > staffer? Obviously it wouldn't be to submit their name as a bug. But i
> We can conclude that VM was distracted first by the mention of the ies4lin
> and second by attempts to attribute the problem to ies4lin, and that,
> because of these distractions, he was unable to assess properly the issue
> at hand. One also concludes that VM over-relied on the features of the
>
> > > Is there a formal process for reviewing an arguably incompetent
> > > bugzilla staffer?
> > To spare everyone time and to skip directly to an entertainment see bug
> > 9147: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
> I agree with Whit. Most of your writing in that bug report would be in
On Wednesday 01 August 2007, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a formal process for reviewing an arguably incompetent bugzilla
> > staffer? Obviously it wouldn't be to submit their name as a bug. But is
> > there any defined administrative layer that concerns i
a friendly fashion is going to end up driving them away from the project.>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 21:09:13 -0600> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
wine-devel@winehq.org> Subject: Re: Is there a process for reviewing a bugzilla
staffer?> > Whit Blauvelt wrote:> > Hi,&
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Hi,
Is there a formal process for reviewing an arguably incompetent bugzilla
staffer? Obviously it wouldn't be to submit their name as a bug. But is
there any defined administrative layer that concerns itself with people on
that level who are dragging on the project?
I look
On 8/1/07, Whit Blauvelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a formal process for reviewing an arguably incompetent bugzilla
> staffer? Obviously it wouldn't be to submit their name as a bug. But is
> there any defined administrative layer that concerns itself with people on
> that level
Hi,
Is there a formal process for reviewing an arguably incompetent bugzilla
staffer? Obviously it wouldn't be to submit their name as a bug. But is
there any defined administrative layer that concerns itself with people on
that level who are dragging on the project?
I looked around a bit for inf
12 matches
Mail list logo
