"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem with Rob's patch is that it causes entire background of
> the progress bar to be repainted. Some time ago (3 years or like that)
> I wrote tests for progress bar and found that it invalidates background
> only when (oldPos < newPos) and
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:12:09PM -0700, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Changelog:
- Fix class style to include the hbrBackground member.
- Fix repainting issues introduced by this change.
- Add WM_ERASEBKGND handler and remove
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Changelog:
- Fix class style to include the hbrBackground member.
- Fix repainting issues introduced by this change.
- Add WM_ERASEBKGND handler and remove background drawing code from
the WM_PAINT handler.
Isn't that goi
"Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't that going to cause a lot of flicker? This was the reason for
> the existing code, because otherwise it looks really bad with apps
> that update the progress bar a lot.
The problem with Rob's patch is that it causes entire background of
the
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:12:09PM -0700, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Changelog:
> > - Fix class style to include the hbrBackground member.
> > - Fix repainting issues introduced by this change.
> > - Add WM_ERASEBKGND handler and remove background
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Changelog:
> - Fix class style to include the hbrBackground member.
> - Fix repainting issues introduced by this change.
> - Add WM_ERASEBKGND handler and remove background drawing code from
> the WM_PAINT handler.
Isn't that going to cause a lot of f
