On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 09:29 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> Would you settle for static alternating colors?
> I'm kind of anti hover highlight.
IIRC there was a recent study claiming that alternating
row colors are not all that useful in practice, the on-hover
has the advantage of focusing your att
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One suggestion that I have is changing the background color
> of the row on hover so you can easily match the result on the
> RHS to the Subject, right now that is a bit difficult to
> do visually on a wide-screen monitor.
Woul
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 08:32 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> You should see your patch appear at
> http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results
Very nice!
One suggestion that I have is changing the background color
of the row on hover so you can easily match the result on the
RHS to the Subject, right
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:45:52 -0700
"Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new machine has a fairly modern nvidia card, so
> more of the tests are actually run.
Where can I find the spec of the new machine ?
Are you using the closed source driver ?
I want to see the full system spec hardware
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm running into http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716
>> more and more often. We really need to set up mock
>> servers so test cases don't need to rely on the public
>> internet.
>
> If a test fails due to mis
From: "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running into http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716
> more and more often. We really need to set up mock
> servers so test cases don't need to rely on the public
> internet.
If a test fails due to missing internet access that's a bug
in t
Kai wrote:
> Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm running into http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716
>> more and more often. We really need to set up mock
>> servers so test cases don't need to rely on the public
>> internet.
>
> Samba has a socket wrapper library that fakes network
Dan Kegel wrote:
> I'm running into http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716
> more and more often. We really need to set up mock
> servers so test cases don't need to rely on the public
> internet.
>
> I'm slowly bringing up a second patchwatcher using
> the newly refactored code. I even wr
On Sunday 26 October 2008 23:00:51 Dan Kegel wrote:
> I'm running into http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716
> more and more often. We really need to set up mock
> servers so test cases don't need to rely on the public
> internet.
Samba has a socket wrapper library that fakes network acce
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any changes compared to the email notification a week ago?
>
> I've received several emails about a failure with my patches but it turns
> out they were marked as "ignore" or "Patch already in git.". I'm not sure I
Dan Kegel wrote:
> Patchwatcher is almost recovered from its move
> to the new machine. I expect to turn email
> notifications back on tomorrow.
>
Hi Dan,
Are there any changes compared to the email notification a week ago?
I've received several emails about a failure with my patches but it t
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patchwatcher is almost recovered from its move
> to the new machine. I expect to turn email
> notifications back on tomorrow.
>
> The old machine could only just barely keep up with
> the patch flow. The new machine is two or
On Monday 25 August 2008 23:58:17 Scott Ritchie wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Henri Verbeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Something else... I sometimes reply to patches, and right now that
> >> seems to cause patchwatcher to complain that my mail doesn't conta
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
#patchwatcher approve
Such a directive would only be recognized if it's alone on a line.
>>> The usual positive reply is 'ACK'. I believe it would be simplest to
>>> grep the r
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Scott Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Henri Verbeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Something else... I sometimes reply to patches, and right now that
>>> seems to cause patchwatcher to complain that my ma
James Hawkins wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Henri Verbeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Something else... I sometimes reply to patches, and right now that
>> seems to cause patchwatcher to complain that my mail doesn't contain a
>> patch. Would it be possible to do something about that?
On Monday 25 August 2008 23:20:40 Dan Kegel wrote:
> Around where I work, LGTM (looks good to me) is the reply that
> denotes approval. And then there's the Apache convention of +1.
> Anyway, I'll recognize one or more of those if and when I get around
> to adding a wine-devel listener. Might b
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > #patchwatcher approve
>> >
>> > Such a directive would only be recognized if it's alone on a line.
>>
>> The usual positive reply is 'ACK'. I believe it would be simplest to
>> grep the reply message for ACK to see if a repl
On Monday 25 August 2008 20:46:51 James Hawkins wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Ken Thomases <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > #patchwatcher approve
> >
> > Such a directive would only be recognized if it's alone on a line.
>
> The usual positive reply is 'ACK'. I believe it would be si
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:46 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Ken Thomases <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Aug 25, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>>
>>> "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Ale
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Ken Thomases <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
>> "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Alexandre Julliard
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
patchwatcher should watch for
On Aug 25, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Alexandre Julliard
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> patchwatcher should watch for replies on wine-devel, and
>>> link the reply to the patch
>>
>> Yes. The ot
"Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> patchwatcher should watch for replies on wine-devel, and
>> link the reply to the patch
>
> Yes. The other similar patchwatching systems I found do this,
> and ours should,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> patchwatcher should watch for replies on wine-devel, and
> link the reply to the patch
Yes. The other similar patchwatching systems I found do this,
and ours should, too.
> and mark the patch as needing further act
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Monday 25 August 2008 00:06:29 Henri Verbeet wrote:
>>> Something else... I sometimes reply to patches, and right now that
>>> seems to cause patchwatcher to complain that my mail doesn't contain a
>>> patch. Would it be poss
Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 25 August 2008 00:06:29 Henri Verbeet wrote:
>> Something else... I sometimes reply to patches, and right now that
>> seems to cause patchwatcher to complain that my mail doesn't contain a
>> patch. Would it be possible to do something about that?
>
On Monday 25 August 2008 00:06:29 Henri Verbeet wrote:
> Something else... I sometimes reply to patches, and right now that
> seems to cause patchwatcher to complain that my mail doesn't contain a
> patch. Would it be possible to do something about that?
I've got to agree with James on that one. R
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Henri Verbeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something else... I sometimes reply to patches, and right now that
> seems to cause patchwatcher to complain that my mail doesn't contain a
> patch. Would it be possible to do something about that? I suppose
> patchwatcher
Something else... I sometimes reply to patches, and right now that
seems to cause patchwatcher to complain that my mail doesn't contain a
patch. Would it be possible to do something about that? I suppose
patchwatcher could ignore replies without patch.
2008/8/24 Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The script now forwards patches that pass all tests to the mailing list
>> http://groups.google.com/group/wine-patches-filtered
>> so potentially Alexandre could start looking only at
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The script now forwards patches that pass all tests to the mailing list
> http://groups.google.com/group/wine-patches-filtered
> so potentially Alexandre could start looking only at that
> list
Hmm. At the moment, patchwatche
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Looks like there is something (else?) wrong with checking the patch series.
>>
>> None of the last patch series (by Juan, James, Rob, Stefan to name a few)
>> are shown on the results page.
>
> Thanks for
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like there is something (else?) wrong with checking the patch series.
>
> None of the last patch series (by Juan, James, Rob, Stefan to name a few)
> are shown on the results page.
Thanks for pointing that out.
It got
Dan Kegel wrote:
> Patchwatcher falsely complained that
> [2/17] richedit: Removed assumption about the order of rtf indent
> didn't apply because the regexp I used to detect
> the end of a patch series falsely matched the
> first patch in a series of 1x patches. Here's the fix:
>
> --- patchwat
On Thursday 14 August 2008 16:38:40 Dan Kegel wrote:
> What to do, what to do... how about this: are there any python users
> on the list who would be willing to help adapt buildbot to our needs?
I've subscribed to the buildbot list as well, and I'll start looking over the
code once I figured ou
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mentioned sporadic test failures in the d3d9:visual and ddraw:visual
> tests earlier, but I did not have time to look at it back then. Can you send
> me logs of the failures and successes?
>
> I am afraid that the d3d
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 2:49 AM, Darragh Bailey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I currently use buildbot at work for managing builds, and it looks like
> that it could handle many of your tasks if patchwatcher could be
> integrated into it.
Good idea. Even Mozilla, home of http://www.mozilla.org/tin
> Patchwatcher is online and giving reasonably good
> feedback on the patch stream. The bug that caused
> every patch to be marked 'failed tests' is fixed, and
> the blacklist is expanded enough that false regressions
> seem to be rare.
You mentioned sporadic test failures in the d3d9:visual and d
Have you considered using some of the tools out there for automated
builds and looking to integrate patchwatcher to extend them to suit your
purpose.
A number of the features you suggest below are most likely already
implemented within existing automated builds.
I currently use buildbot at work f
39 matches
Mail list logo
