Re: WoW, er Wine on Windows--Re: Still more fun?

2005-04-25 Thread Augustus Saunders
All, thanks for your responses. There's an important point that I forgot in my first email which explains what I hope to get from WINE. We don't just want to grab static screenshots, we ultimately want to do appsharing in Flash, almost like X Windows or terminal server type stuff, except

Re: WoW, er Wine on Windows--Re: Still more fun?

2005-04-24 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Mike McCormack wrote: Augustus Saunders wrote: As for what we hope to accomplish, well, it might seem like massive overkill to try using WINE, but it's the only plausible way I've come up with. Basically, we want to substitute all the graphics/windowing/GDI etc so that we can record all the

RE: WoW, er Wine on Windows--Re: Still more fun?

2005-04-24 Thread Rolf Kalbermatter
Augustus Saunders wrote: As for what we hope to accomplish, well, it might seem like massive overkill to try using WINE, but it's the only plausible way I've come up with. Basically, we want to substitute all the graphics/windowing/GDI etc so that we can record all the painting/rendering into

Re: WoW, er Wine on Windows--Re: Still more fun?

2005-04-23 Thread Steven Edwards
--- Augustus Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I appreciate any feedback anybody has. Thanks- It wont work for DirectX. Wine directX structures and implementation is incompatible with Windows currently. Normal Win32 dlls work fine. Thanks Steven

Re: WoW, er Wine on Windows--Re: Still more fun?

2005-04-23 Thread Mike McCormack
Augustus Saunders wrote: As for what we hope to accomplish, well, it might seem like massive overkill to try using WINE, but it's the only plausible way I've come up with. Basically, we want to substitute all the graphics/windowing/GDI etc so that we can record all the painting/rendering into