Robert Shearman wrote:
Giles Cameron wrote:
After learning about the wine debuging output's level system, and seeing
it be used for a while, I think its time we make a couple of new
channels.
They would be like the 'trace' channel, only for more spefic purposes,
these could by default be
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 16:42, Giles Cameron wrote:
Hi
What I mean is having more levels in there because it seems like they
are being abbused right now, eg, it very well may be an error but it
isn't of use to many people. so it should be put somewhere someone who
is looking for it could
On 3/21/07, Giles Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Shearman wrote:
Giles Cameron wrote:
After learning about the wine debuging output's level system, and seeing
it be used for a while, I think its time we make a couple of new
channels.
They would be like the 'trace' channel, only
Giles Cameron wrote:
After learning about the wine debuging output's level system, and seeing
it be used for a while, I think its time we make a couple of new channels.
They would be like the 'trace' channel, only for more spefic purposes,
these could by default be compiled out, but when needed
After learning about the wine debuging output's level system, and seeing
it be used for a while, I think its time we make a couple of new channels.
They would be like the 'trace' channel, only for more spefic purposes,
these could by default be compiled out, but when needed put in.
Their primary
On 3/19/07, Giles Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After learning about the wine debuging output's level system, and seeing
it be used for a while, I think its time we make a couple of new channels.
They would be like the 'trace' channel, only for more spefic purposes,
these could by default be