Re: Wine support for win64

2008-11-05 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It may be a bit paranoid, and maybe it's not worth it (though I don't think it costs us much). In any case, whatever Alexandre decides I'll follow. I don't think it's worth it. There's no real logic to how the various types are used in the API

Re: Wine support for win64

2008-11-04 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
This summer Maarten Lankhorst did some basic work on win64 support but for the rest no work has been done it for a long time. I'm not sure what Maarten exactly did but but there is a lot of work to be done before it will run even a basic app. Roderick Hi, i'd like to know if anyone knows the

Re: Wine support for win64

2008-11-04 Thread Steven Edwards
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Stefan Dösinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we still have the problem that gcc doesn't support the calling convention Win64 uses, so we can't compile a Wine that is compatible with Win64 apps. That may be fixed in gcc already though. I haven't checked

Re: Wine support for win64

2008-11-04 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:36:02PM +0100, Stefan Dösinger wrote: This summer Maarten Lankhorst did some basic work on win64 support but for the rest no work has been done it for a long time. I'm not sure what Maarten exactly did but but there is a lot of work to be done before it will run

RE: Wine support for win64

2008-11-04 Thread Francois Gouget
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Stefan Dösinger wrote: [...] I think we still have the problem that gcc doesn't support the calling convention Win64 uses, so we can't compile a Wine that is compatible with Win64 apps. In the meantime we can work on the long vs. LONG issue: * there are a number of places

Re: Wine support for win64

2008-11-04 Thread Reece Dunn
2008/11/4 Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Stefan Dösinger wrote: [...] I think we still have the problem that gcc doesn't support the calling convention Win64 uses, so we can't compile a Wine that is compatible with Win64 apps. In the meantime we can work on the long

Re: Wine support for win64

2008-11-04 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Francois Gouget wrote: On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Stefan Dösinger wrote: [...] I think we still have the problem that gcc doesn't support the calling convention Win64 uses, so we can't compile a Wine that is compatible with Win64 apps. In the meantime we can work on the long vs. LONG issue: *

RE: Wine support for win64

2008-11-04 Thread Stefan Dösinger
This summer Maarten Lankhorst did some basic work on win64 support but for the rest no work has been done it for a long time. I'm not sure what Maarten exactly did but but there is a lot of work to be done before it will run even a basic app. I think we still have the problem that gcc doesn't

Re: Wine support for win64

2008-11-04 Thread Francois Gouget
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: [...] The fix for all these is to replace 'long' with 'LONG' which Wine keeps 32bit just like Windows (though I wonder if we should not use something lile 'wine_long' instead). What would 'wine_long' gain us? LONG is already ugly enough. The

Wine support for win64

2008-11-03 Thread Alessandro
Hi, i'd like to know if anyone knows the current status of wine's support fro win64. I've tried to build a git checkout with --enable-win64 configure switch. It has taken some tinkering to make it build, but after that i'm not able to run anything and ti seems that wineboot cannot start. Any