In WWN 264 there's the following:
lt;rantgt;
...
lt;/rantgt;
But it does not get through in the HTML page because it's getting
transformed into rant.../rant which the browser is correctly
ignoring. We've had this problem before but I don't remember what the
fix is... Do you?
--
Francois Gouget
Francois Gouget wrote:
In WWN 264 there's the following:
lt;rantgt;
...
lt;/rantgt;
But it does not get through in the HTML page because it's getting
transformed into rant.../rant which the browser is correctly
ignoring. We've had this problem before but I don't remember what the
fix is... Do
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:38:22 +, Paul Millar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it not be just amp;lt;rantamp;gt; ?
XML - HTML renders this to lt;rantgt;, which the browser will render as
rant.
No.. that didn't work. Good tip though.
Newman - any ideas? Maybe lt;nbsp;rantnbsp;gt;? I think
Would it not be just amp;lt;rantamp;gt; ?
XML - HTML renders this to lt;rantgt;, which the browser will render as
rant.
HTH,
Paul.
On Tuesday 08 Mar 2005 10:26, Francois Gouget wrote:
In WWN 264 there's the following:
lt;rantgt;
...
lt;/rantgt;
But it does not get through in the HTML
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 08:43 -0700, Brian Vincent wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:38:22 +, Paul Millar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it not be just amp;lt;rantamp;gt; ?
XML - HTML renders this to lt;rantgt;, which the browser will render as
rant.
No.. that didn't work. Good tip
