On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2012, 20:23:36 schrieb Matteo Bruni:
>> I'm not sure that's a good idea. ddraw.h is not included in recent
>> DirectX SDKs and the relevant definitions are "gone", as far as I
>> know. So I think d3dx9 or its tests
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Matteo Bruni wrote:
> Il 19 aprile 2012 19:37, Józef Kucia ha scritto:
>> ---
>> dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/surface.c | 65
>> +
>> 1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/surfac
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2012, 20:23:36 schrieb Matteo Bruni:
> I'm not sure that's a good idea. ddraw.h is not included in recent
> DirectX SDKs and the relevant definitions are "gone", as far as I
> know. So I think d3dx9 or its tests should not depend on that header.
Furthermore the ddraw.h type
Il 19 aprile 2012 19:37, Józef Kucia ha scritto:
> ---
> dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/surface.c | 65
> +
> 1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/surface.c b/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/surface.c
> index 87aa03e..51d6ebd 1
