Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
It seems there are some code paths (in the error case?) which may
leave this unitialized. At least the compiler thinks so, and I
could not convince myself otherwise reading this code for a while.
It's a false positive, probably coming from the compiler not picking up
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Robert Shearman wrote:
It's a false positive, probably coming from the compiler not picking
up that it is set when the exception variable is false and that when
exception is true it is set earlier in the function.
Ah, thanks for the analysis. I couldn't convince myself
