Re: gecko download not robust?

2008-02-15 Thread Jan Zerebecki
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:55:26AM -0600, Austin English wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:32 AM, TheBlunderbuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > marco wrote: > > > I can make a separate package of gecko > > This sounds good to me, but lets not compartmentalize wine too much, > > like Debian. >

Re: gecko download not robust?

2008-02-15 Thread Austin English
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:32 AM, TheBlunderbuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > marco wrote: > > I looked into it. > > And there are some options. > > > > I can make a separate package of gecko that I can make it a > > dependencie of wine. > > Problem is people have to know where to find it

Re: gecko download not robust?

2008-02-15 Thread TheBlunderbuss
marco wrote: > I looked into it. > And there are some options. > > I can make a separate package of gecko that I can make it a > dependencie of wine. > Problem is people have to know where to find it or the get stuck. > > I can also make the package and make it not a dependencie on wine but >

Re: gecko download not robust?

2008-02-14 Thread Jacek Caban
Steven Edwards wrote: > On Feb 10, 2008 10:11 PM, Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Compiling the package is quite tricky. I've compiled it on Windows XP >> using MSVC. There is no other way ATM, so I think that my Gecko package >> should be included as is in Linux packages. >> >

Re: gecko download not robust?

2008-02-14 Thread Austin English
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:08 PM, marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes a suggested package is possible. But most people would not know it > is there and would not install it. Could adjust the current dialog that asks to install gecko to say something to the effect of 'This package may also be av

Re: gecko download not robust?

2008-02-14 Thread marco
Yes a suggested package is possible. But most people would not know it is there and would not install it. What is the status of the gecko package. Is it something people really need for a good wine experience or do we want to present it as a suggestion ? Marco Austin English wrote: > You could

Re: gecko download not robust?

2008-02-13 Thread marco
Austin English wrote: > On Feb 9, 2008 5:17 PM, marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Hmm. gecko download hung for me once. I saw >>> fixme:urlmon:ProtocolStream_Read Read failed: 800c0008 >>> in the log, which makes me wonder if our download code >>> doesn't handle transient network errors

Re: gecko download not robust?

2008-02-13 Thread Steven Edwards
On Feb 10, 2008 10:11 PM, Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Compiling the package is quite tricky. I've compiled it on Windows XP > using MSVC. There is no other way ATM, so I think that my Gecko package > should be included as is in Linux packages. Where is the source package? Is it just f

Re: gecko download not robust?

2008-02-13 Thread Austin English
You could make it a suggested package, a la wine-dev. Including is also a possibility, but keep in mind that's several megabytes that don't change with each release (or that often) that have to be redownloaded each time. I've got high bandwith, so doesn't bother me, but a lot of people don't... -A

Re: gecko download not robust?

2008-02-10 Thread Jacek Caban
Scott Ritchie wrote: > This would be ideal, however last I heard gecko didn't compile properly > in mingw. Is this no longer the case? Can we build it on Ubuntu? > Compiling the package is quite tricky. I've compiled it on Windows XP using MSVC. There is no other way ATM, so I think that my

Re: gecko download not robust?

2008-02-10 Thread Scott Ritchie
Austin English wrote: > On Feb 9, 2008 5:17 PM, marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hmm. gecko download hung for me once. I saw >>> fixme:urlmon:ProtocolStream_Read Read failed: 800c0008 >>> in the log, which makes me wonder if our download code >>> doesn't handle transient network errors well.

Re: gecko download not robust?

2008-02-10 Thread Jacek Caban
Dan Kegel wrote: > Hmm. gecko download hung for me once. I saw > fixme:urlmon:ProtocolStream_Read Read failed: 800c0008 > in the log, which makes me wonder if our download code > doesn't handle transient network errors well. > It looks like urlmon bug. Our Gecko downloader is also not really

Re: gecko download not robust?

2008-02-09 Thread Austin English
On Feb 9, 2008 5:17 PM, marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hmm. gecko download hung for me once. I saw > > fixme:urlmon:ProtocolStream_Read Read failed: 800c0008 > > in the log, which makes me wonder if our download code > > doesn't handle transient network errors well. > > > > Time to ge

re: gecko download not robust?

2008-02-09 Thread marco
> > Hmm. gecko download hung for me once. I saw > fixme:urlmon:ProtocolStream_Read Read failed: 800c0008 > in the log, which makes me wonder if our download code > doesn't handle transient network errors well. > > Time to get rid of the download, and just bundle gecko outright, I say... I make t