On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Milan Kostić smoki00...@gmail.com wrote:
Really, it works for first few levels, but in the middle of The
Sanctuary of Stone and Fire (and upper levels periodicaly) it start
to gives head of Pirate:) (screenshot attached) and no more playing
is possibile. This
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:57:39PM -0600, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
TheBlunderbuss wrote:
It has just occurred to me that safedisc copy protection (bug 219!)
wasn't put on the Wine 1.0 task list. It's a pretty major bug and covers
a wide range of programs, with a wide range of safedisc
Darragh Bailey wrote:
There has been some movement in the past to split up the Safedisc bug
and deal with the individual versions separately. Would it be useful to
advance this? I'm certain that I have a number of games that listed as
apps affected by this bug that no longer have a problem. So
It has just occurred to me that safedisc
copy protection (bug 219!) wasn't put on the Wine 1.0 task list. It's a
pretty major bug and covers a wide range of programs, with a wide range
of safedisc versions.
Considering this, how should we plan for this implementation?
TheBlunderbuss wrote:
It has just occurred to me that safedisc copy protection (bug 219!)
wasn't put on the Wine 1.0 task list. It's a pretty major bug and covers
a wide range of programs, with a wide range of safedisc versions.
Considering this, how should we plan
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
And if we delay it a bit more maybe we can slip in Safedisc
support too...
Regarding which, does anyone have more up-to-date code and/or
information regarding Safedisc support, than what is currently
on the brand new Wine wiki page: http://wiki.winehq.org/SafeDisc
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 05:31:03PM +0300, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
And if we delay it a bit more maybe we can slip in Safedisc
support too...
Regarding which, does anyone have more up-to-date code and/or
information regarding Safedisc support, than what is currently
Am Sonntag 25 März 2007 17:33 schrieb Phil Costin:
Also, just out of interest, would a working safedisc implementation provide
the necessary underpinnings to support the hexalock copy protection system?
(http://hexalock.co.il/)
I think the needed infrastructure is the same, but of course we
Stefan Dösinger wrote:
Am Sonntag 25 März 2007 17:33 schrieb Phil Costin:
Also, just out of interest, would a working safedisc implementation
provide the necessary underpinnings to support the hexalock copy
protection system? (http://hexalock.co.il/)
I think the needed infrastructure
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 15:22:42 +0100, ivanleo wrote:
Safedisc 2 and above are not supported.
Is the reason why not on the Wiki? Would be cool to get it there if not.
To run a safedisc protected game, you must run winecfg and
set the drive type of your cdrom drive to cdrom in the drives tab
Safedisc has now been working on wine for almost a year, but it'll
still take some time before we get the code into winehq, so I've
decided to build an RPM of wine with safedisc 1 support so users can
play around with it, you can download it from
http://www003.portalis.it/115/wine-safedisc-0.9.16
Can you tell us what are all the specific pathces went in to this rpm
with releated to safedisc?
I know that Vitaly's ntoskernel patch is isn, what else.
Thanks,
Vijay
On 6/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Safedisc has now been working on wine for almost a year, but it'll
On 24/06/06, Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you tell us what are all the specific pathces went in to this rpm
with releated to safedisc?
I know that Vitaly's ntoskernel patch is isn, what else.
All the safedisc related code developed in the last year or so, I can
send you
went in to this rpm
with releated to safedisc?
I know that Vitaly's ntoskernel patch is isn, what else.
All the safedisc related code developed in the last year or so, I can
send you a full diff against winehq if you want.
Ivan.
Hi,
I would like to know about what is required for the irp framework to
be implemented for wine.
I just want to put enough information so that it might be possible for
someone or even me to pick-up this issue.
May be this might be ready for the next years Google SOC. ;)
Thanks,
Vijay
On 30/04/06, Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know about what is required for the irp framework to
be implemented for wine.
Well we never actually wrote a real irp queue system, we simply had a
single irp stack allocated irp struct that we recycled for each call.
We might put some initial effort, so that when more hands will make it faster.
Im quite illiterate with Win32 API, but i might look into your effort
and make some changes.
Thanks,
Vijay
On 4/30/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/04/06, Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,I would like to propose the SafeDisc Project for wine.Main Objective: Support for SafeDisc (basically ver 1 Support) Part 1 (Getting the basic IRP support)Secondary Objective: Have wine specific ntoskrnl.exe
that handles thisRequirements: Needs to have in depth knowledge of Win32 Internals
* On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
* Monday, November 21, 2005, 4:54:56 PM, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
Raphael Junqueira asked on bugzilla what the safedisc status is.
Currently it works fine, and I believe what we have is more or less
ready for CVS. However Vitaly told me
--- Saulius Krasuckas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
* Monday, November 21, 2005, 4:54:56 PM, Ivan Leo
Puoti wrote:
Raphael Junqueira asked on bugzilla what the
safedisc status is.
Currently it works fine, and I believe what we
have is more
Monday, November 21, 2005, 4:54:56 PM, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
Raphael Junqueira asked on bugzilla what the safedisc status is. Currently it
works fine, and I
believe what we have is more or less ready for CVS. However Vitaly
told me Alexandre didn't like the
object manager Vitaly wrote
Raphael Junqueira asked on bugzilla what the safedisc status is. Currently it works fine, and I
believe what we have is more or less ready for CVS. However Vitaly told me Alexandre didn't like the
object manager Vitaly wrote, mostly he didn't like permanent objects, that drivers depend on. I
Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
Finally we've got safedisc1 running on linux.
Thanks go to Laurent Pinchart, Vitaliy Margolen, Brad DeMorrow,
Marcus Meissner, and Alexandre for contributing time/code/ideas.
Additionally thanks for pointers and suggestions from the ReactOS team.
Ivan.
Oh, and here's an actualy in game shot, if you're a fan of the game you'll probably notice I'm out
of practice.
http://www003.portalis.it/115/wine/safediscworks2.png
Ivan.
and weeks.
Two games have been tested, they both use the same version of safedisc
(don't ask how we know, we do)
http://www.kievinfo.com/images/wine/HoM3_1.jpg
http://www.kievinfo.com/images/wine/safediscworks.jpg
Ivan.
*
to be
good enough for cvs over the coming days and weeks.
Two games have been tested, they both use the same version of safedisc
(don't ask how we know, we do)
http://www.kievinfo.com/images/wine/HoM3_1.jpg
http://www.kievinfo.com/images/wine/safediscworks.jpg
Will this support versions 1.6.0
Tom Wickline wrote:
Will this support versions 1.6.0 through version 1.50.20 ?
1.6.0 was the first version of safedisk, version 1.11.0 introduced secdrv.sys
and NT support. And do you know if it supports dplayerx.dll and the
second layer of encryption that is applied on the ICD that is in
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 07:45:25PM -0400, Stephen Torri wrote:
I synced with CVS and applied your patch. I get a problem compiling
dlls/ntdll/file.c:
The problem was an operator error in failing to copy a file to the right
location. I do get a real error, honest I do.
Hi guys,
Mike Hearn asked me to send the work in progress stuff, so here it is
(some stuff has been removed for legal reasons, so you can't run it in
a debugger). Some of it sucks (See QueryServiceStatus for the worst hack
ever, that doesn't even usually work), but the design should be more
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 21:32 +0200, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
Hi guys,
Mike Hearn asked me to send the work in progress stuff, so here it is
(some stuff has been removed for legal reasons, so you can't run it in
a debugger). Some of it sucks (See QueryServiceStatus for the worst hack
ever,
I synced with CVS and applied your patch. I get a problem compiling
dlls/ntdll/file.c:
The problem was an operator error in failing to copy a file to the right
location. I do get a real error, honest I do.
fixme:ntdll:NtCreateFile failing because of error c00f
fixme:file:CreateFileW
I've attempted to implement RtlQueryRegistryValues()
This code is probably buggy, as I haven't tested it much, but it makes safedisc
happy.
If it's OK I'll send a patch to add it to ntdll, ntoskrnl will then forward
calls.
comments/corrections/thoughts welcome.
Ivan.
/*
* Copyright 2004-2005
Chances are I'll be quite busy during the next week, but Laurent Pinchart,
the guy who originally reverse engineered safedisc, asked a few
questions on IRC about
implementing support for the native safedisc driver, feedback,
particularly from AJ, would be very
appreciated, here is the IRC log
Hello geeks,
I've got safedisc and ntoskrnl to load, unfortunately safedisc throws an exception as soon as it
starts, so I'll be learning x86 assembly (cool!) soon to try and work this out.
I've got ntoskrnl with all the correct prototypes for safedisc, and I've added some definitions to
our
The attached patch is the first step towards supporting safedisc, it adds code sent from Marcus a
few months ago to the current dlls/ntdll/virtual.c
It allows us to successfully load the secdrv.sys file into memory. It has been tested with the copy
of safedisc that comes with Age of Empires 2
35 matches
Mail list logo
