stdout for win16 tests

2007-10-12 Thread Dan Kegel
win16 doesn't have the notion of stdout/stderr, so 16 bit C compilers like watcom tend to simulate stdout by putting up a window. http://win16test.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/test.h (a port of the 32 bit test.h) uses freopen to open a log file to receive all the ok() and trace() output from the

Re: win16 tests

2007-08-13 Thread Jakob Eriksson
It would be sweet if you put up the executables too. Jennifer Lai wrote: Hi, I've collected and fixed some win16 tests. Since they are not going to be included in the wine tree, I've placed them under http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~jlai/win16test/ In order to build these tests, Open Watcom

win16 tests

2007-08-10 Thread Jennifer Lai
Hi, I've collected and fixed some win16 tests. Since they are not going to be included in the wine tree, I've placed them under http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~jlai/win16test/ In order to build these tests, Open Watcom was used. The tar ball also includes the scripts of installing Open Watcom, building

win16 tests

2007-08-10 Thread Jennifer Lai
Hi, I've collected and fixed some win16 tests. Since they are not going to be included in the wine tree, I've placed them under http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~jlai/win16test/ http://www.cs.ucla.edu/%7Ejlai/win16test/ In order to build these tests, Open Watcom was used. The tar ball also includes

Re: Call for win16 tests

2007-07-09 Thread Markus Amsler
Dan Kegel wrote: As Andreas Mohr pointed out a while back, http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-August/039602.html we really need a win16 test suite to make sure our win16 support doesn't rot. As far as I know, nobody's managed to get win16 tests into the tree, presumably because

Re: Call for win16 tests

2007-07-09 Thread Dan Kegel
On 7/9/07, Markus Amsler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have to distinguish between win16 and dos tests. Absolutely. dos .com executables currently don't work, but win16 .exe's with the same contents do work. I plan to test DOS .com files using very simple pure assembly. (That was the real way

Re: Call for win16 tests

2007-07-09 Thread Markus Amsler
Dan Kegel wrote: On 7/9/07, Markus Amsler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have to distinguish between win16 and dos tests. Absolutely. dos .com executables currently don't work, but win16 .exe's with the same contents do work. I plan to test DOS .com files using very simple pure assembly. (That

Call for win16 tests

2007-07-05 Thread Dan Kegel
As Andreas Mohr pointed out a while back, http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-August/039602.html we really need a win16 test suite to make sure our win16 support doesn't rot. As far as I know, nobody's managed to get win16 tests into the tree, presumably because the build process